Difference between revisions of "Absence"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
== The Symbolic Order == | == The Symbolic Order == | ||
− | According to [[Jacques Lacan]], | + | According to [[Jacques Lacan]], |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | The [[symbolic order]] is characterized by a binary opposition between [[absence]] and [[presence]].<ref>{{S4}} p.67-8</ref> | ||
[[Lacan]] asserts the mutual implication of [[absence]] and [[presence]] in the [[symbolic]] [[order]]. | [[Lacan]] asserts the mutual implication of [[absence]] and [[presence]] in the [[symbolic]] [[order]]. | ||
− | In the [[symbolic | + | |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | In the [[symbolic order]] "nothing exists except upon an assumed foundation of absence."<ref>{{Ec}} p.392</ref> | ||
+ | |||
[[Lacan]] argues that "there is no absence in the real. There is only absence if you suggest that there may be a presence there where there isn't one."<ref>{{S2}} p.313</ref> | [[Lacan]] argues that "there is no absence in the real. There is only absence if you suggest that there may be a presence there where there isn't one."<ref>{{S2}} p.313</ref> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | As [[Roman Jakobson showed with his analysis ofphonemes, all linguistic phenomena may be netirely characterized in terms of the presence or absence of certain distinctive features. | ||
+ | |||
== Fort-Da == | == Fort-Da == |
Revision as of 20:53, 25 July 2006
The Symbolic Order
According to Jacques Lacan,
The symbolic order is characterized by a binary opposition between absence and presence.[1]
Lacan asserts the mutual implication of absence and presence in the symbolic order.
In the symbolic order "nothing exists except upon an assumed foundation of absence."[2]
Lacan argues that "there is no absence in the real. There is only absence if you suggest that there may be a presence there where there isn't one."[3]
As [[Roman Jakobson showed with his analysis ofphonemes, all linguistic phenomena may be netirely characterized in terms of the presence or absence of certain distinctive features.
Fort-Da
According to Lacan, the game of fort-da, introduced by Freud in "[[Beyond the Pleasure Principle," represents the child's entrance into the symbolic order.
The phonemic opposition - "fort" and "da" - are "a pair of sounds modulated on presence and absence."[4]
Language
The symbol is used in the absence of the thing.
Lacan argues that the word is a "presence made of absence."[5]
Absence has a positive existence in the symbolic as presence.
Lacan argues that "the nothing" (le rien) is in itself an object (or 'partial object').[6]
Sexual Difference
Sexual difference is apprehended by the child symbolically around the presence and absence of the phallus.
See Also
References
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Le Séminaire. Livre IV. La relation d'objet, 19566-57. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. Paris: Seuil, 1991. p.67-8
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Écrits. Paris: Seuil, 1966. p.392
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book II. The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis, 1954-55. Trans. Sylvana Tomaselli. New York: Nortion; Cambridge: Cambridge Unviersity Press, 1988. p.313
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.65
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.65
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Le Séminaire. Livre IV. La relation d'objet, 19566-57. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. Paris: Seuil, 1991. p.184-5