Difference between revisions of "Signified"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{Top}}signifié{{Bottom}} | ||
+ | |||
==Ferdinand de Saussure== | ==Ferdinand de Saussure== | ||
According to [[Saussure]], the [[signified]] is the [[conceptual]] element of the [[sign]]. | According to [[Saussure]], the [[signified]] is the [[conceptual]] element of the [[sign]]. | ||
− | It is not the real [[object]] denoted by a [[sign]] -- the [[referent]] -- but a [[psychological]] entity corresponding to such an [[object]].<ref>[[Saussure|Saussure, Ferdinand de]]. | + | It is not the real [[object]] denoted by a [[sign]] -- the [[referent]] -- but a [[psychological]] entity corresponding to such an [[object]].<ref>[[Saussure|Saussure, Ferdinand de]]. ''[[Saussure|Course in General Linguistics]]'', ed. Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, trans. Wade Baskin, Glasgow: Collins Fontana. 1916. p.66-7</ref> |
==Jacques Lacan== | ==Jacques Lacan== | ||
− | + | ===Primacy of the Signifier=== | |
For [[Saussure]], the [[signified]] has the same status as the [[signifier]]; both form equal sides of the [[sign]]. | For [[Saussure]], the [[signified]] has the same status as the [[signifier]]; both form equal sides of the [[sign]]. | ||
Line 12: | Line 14: | ||
In other words, the [[signified]] is not given, but produced. | In other words, the [[signified]] is not given, but produced. | ||
− | + | ===Materialism of Language=== | |
[[Lacan]]'s view is thus opposed to an expressionist view of [[language]], according to which [[concepts]] exist in some pre-verbal state before being expressed in the [[material]] medium of [[language]]. | [[Lacan]]'s view is thus opposed to an expressionist view of [[language]], according to which [[concepts]] exist in some pre-verbal state before being expressed in the [[material]] medium of [[language]]. | ||
Line 18: | Line 20: | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
+ | {{See}} | ||
+ | * [[Language]] | ||
+ | * [[Materialism]] | ||
+ | || | ||
+ | * [[Metaphor]] | ||
* [[Sign]] | * [[Sign]] | ||
+ | || | ||
* [[Signification]] | * [[Signification]] | ||
* [[Signifier]] | * [[Signifier]] | ||
− | + | {{Also}} | |
− | |||
− | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
Line 37: | Line 43: | ||
[[Category:Terms]] | [[Category:Terms]] | ||
[[Category:OK]] | [[Category:OK]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | __NOTOC__ |
Revision as of 16:40, 24 August 2006
French: signifié |
Ferdinand de Saussure
According to Saussure, the signified is the conceptual element of the sign.
It is not the real object denoted by a sign -- the referent -- but a psychological entity corresponding to such an object.[1]
Jacques Lacan
Primacy of the Signifier
For Saussure, the signified has the same status as the signifier; both form equal sides of the sign.
Lacan, on the other hand, asserts the primacy of the signifier, and argues that the signified is a mere effect of the play of signifiers, an effect of the process of signification produced by metaphor.
In other words, the signified is not given, but produced.
Materialism of Language
Lacan's view is thus opposed to an expressionist view of language, according to which concepts exist in some pre-verbal state before being expressed in the material medium of language.
In contrast to such a view, Lacan asserts the priority (logical rather than chronological) of the material element of language.
See Also
References
- ↑ Saussure, Ferdinand de. Course in General Linguistics, ed. Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, trans. Wade Baskin, Glasgow: Collins Fontana. 1916. p.66-7