Difference between revisions of "Talk:Need"
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| Line 22: | Line 6: | ||
The concept of a pre-linguistic need is thus merely a hypothesis, and the subject of this pure need is a mythicla subject. | The concept of a pre-linguistic need is thus merely a hypothesis, and the subject of this pure need is a mythicla subject. | ||
| − | + | {{Encore}} | |
| − | + | : [[Necessity]], 59, 94 | |
| − | + | : [[Needs]], 51 | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | [[ | ||
| − | |||
| − | [[ | ||
Latest revision as of 11:23, 12 November 2006
-- It is not the case that there first exists a subject of pur eneed which then attempts to articulate that need in language, since the distinction between pure need and its articulation in demand only exists from the moment of its articulation, by which time it is impossible ot determine what that pure need could have been. The concept of a pre-linguistic need is thus merely a hypothesis, and the subject of this pure need is a mythicla subject.
Index
- Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XX: Encore, On Feminine Sexuality, The Limits of Love and Knowledge 1972-1973. Trans. Bruce Fink. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1998.
