Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Metalanguage

1,333 bytes added, 19:25, 20 May 2019
The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).
Metalanguage is the technical term in linguistics for any form of language which is used to describe the properties of language.Roman Jakobson includes the metalingual function in his list of the functions of language.<ref>Jakobson, 1960:25</ref>{{Top}}métalangage{{Bottom}}
Lacan's first reference =====Linguistic Definition====="[[Metalanguage]]" is the technical [[linguistic]] term for any [[form]] of [[language]] which is used to metalanguage comes in 1956, when he echoes Jakobson's view on describe or analyze the metalingual function properties of all [[another]] [[language: "all language implies a metalanguage, its already a metalanguage of its own register]]."<ref>S3, 226</ref>
A few years later, =====Roman Jakobson=====[[Roman Jakobson]] includes the metalingual function in 1960, he says precisely his [[list]] of the opposite, arguing that "no metalanguage can be spokenfunctions of [[language]]."<ref>E 311[[Roman Jakobson|Jakobson, Roman]]. "Linguistics and poetics," in ''Selected Writings'', vol. II, ''[[Poetry]] of Grammar and Grammar of Poetry'', The [[Hague]]: Mouton, 1981 [1960]., p. 25</ref>
What =====Jacques Lacan appears ==========Early Work=====[[Lacan]]'s first reference to mean by this remark is that[[metalanguage]] comes in 1956, since every attempt to fix when he echoes [[Jakobson]]'s view on the meaning metalingual function of all [[language must be done in language, there can be no escape from language, no "outside."]]:
This is reminiscent of Heidegger's views on the impossibility of exiting <blockquote>"the house All [[language]] implies a [[metalanguage]], its already a [[metalanguage]] of languageits own [[register]]."<ref>{{S3}} p. 226</ref></blockquote>
This also appears similar to the structuralist theme of ''il n'y a rien hors du texte'' ('there is nothing outside the text')=====Later Work=====A few years later, but it is not the same; Lacan does not deny that there is a beyond of language (this beyond is the real)in 1960, but he does argue that this beyond is not of a kind that could finally anchor meaning. There issays precisely the opposite, in other words, no transcendental signified, no way arguing that language could "tell the truth about truthno [[metalanguage]] can be spoken."<ref>Ec 867-8{{E}} p.311</ref>
=====No "Outside" of Language=====What [[Lacan]] appears to mean by this remark is that, since every attempt to fix the [[signification|meaning]] of [[language]] must be done in [[language]], there can be no escape from [[language]], no "outside". This is reminiscent of [[Heidegger]]'s views on the [[impossibility]] of exiting "the house of language." =====Metalanguage Does Not Exist=====[[Lacan]] rejects the very possibility of a [[metalanguage|metalinguistic dimension]], denies the [[existence]] of any [[metalanguage]]. [[Lacan]] follows [[Heidegger]]'s view of [[language]] as a "house of [[being]]" of which it is [[impossible]] to step [[outside]]. =====Meaning Beyond Language=====This also appears similar to the [[structuralism|structuralist]] theme of ''il n'y a rien hors du texte'' ("there is [[nothing]] outside the [[text]]"), but it is not the same; [[Lacan]] does not deny that there is a beyond of [[language]] (this beyond is the [[real]]), but he does argue that this beyond is not of a kind that could finally anchor [[signification|meaning]]. There is, in other [[words]], no [[transcendental]] [[signified]], no way that [[language]] could "tell the [[truth]] [[about]] truth."<ref>{{Ec}} p. 867-8</ref> =====No Other of the Other=====The same point is also expressed in the phrase; :  <blockquote>"there There is no [[Other of the Other]]."<ref>{{E }} p. 311</ref></blockquote> If the [[Other ]] is the [[guarantee ]] of the [[coherence ]] of the [[subject]]'s [[discourse]], then the [[falsity ]] of this guarantee is revealed by the fact that the [[guarantor ]] himself [[lacks ]] such a guarantee.  =====Transference=====In a [[clinical ]] context, this means that there is no [[metalanguage ]] of the [[transference]], no point outside the [[transference ]] from which it could be finally [[interpretation|interpreted ]] and '"liquidated'." ==See Also=={{See}}* [[Discourse]]* [[Interpretation]]||* [[Language]]* [[Linguistics]]||* [[Other]]* [[Real]]||* [[Subject]]* [[Transference]]{{Also}}
==References==
<div style="font-size:11px" class="references-small">
<references/>
</div>
{{OK}}
[[Category:Linguistics]]
[[Category:Language]]
[[Category:Symbolic]]
[[Category:TermsOK]][[Category:Concepts]][[Category:Psychoanalysis]][[Category:Jacques Lacan]]__NOTOC__
Anonymous user

Navigation menu