Difference between revisions of "Law: From Superego to Love"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | ||
==Introduction== | ==Introduction== | ||
[[Žižek]]'s account of [[law]] is built upon the reiteration of the idea that ''[[law]] is [[split]]'' or that ''there is a [[parallax view|parallax]] [[gap]] between the '''[[public]] [[letter]]''' and its '''[[obscene]] [[superego]] [[supplement]]'''''.<ref>{{Z}} ''[[The Parallax View]]''. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2006. p. 10.</ref> | [[Žižek]]'s account of [[law]] is built upon the reiteration of the idea that ''[[law]] is [[split]]'' or that ''there is a [[parallax view|parallax]] [[gap]] between the '''[[public]] [[letter]]''' and its '''[[obscene]] [[superego]] [[supplement]]'''''.<ref>{{Z}} ''[[The Parallax View]]''. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2006. p. 10.</ref> | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
=====Founding Law===== | =====Founding Law===== | ||
− | + | ==Split Law== | |
=====Surplus===== | =====Surplus===== | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=====Lack===== | =====Lack===== | ||
− | + | ==Enjoying Law== | |
====Love With Law==== | ====Love With Law==== | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
=====Attachment to Law: From Enjoyment Through Duty to Enjoyment in Love===== | =====Attachment to Law: From Enjoyment Through Duty to Enjoyment in Love===== | ||
− | + | ==Conclusion: Hope in Law== | |
− | + | ==Notes== | |
<references/> | <references/> |
Revision as of 21:22, 10 September 2006
Introduction
Žižek's account of law is built upon the reiteration of the idea that law is split or that there is a parallax gap between the public letter and its obscene superego supplement.[1]
(This chapter focuses on the split in law, drawing out its repercussions for thinking about law more generally.)
Law's Founding
Founding Crime
Founding Law
Split Law
Surplus
Lack
Enjoying Law
Love With Law
The Object in Law: From Superego to Objet Petit a
Attachment to Law: From Enjoyment Through Duty to Enjoyment in Love
Conclusion: Hope in Law
Notes
- ↑ Žižek, Slavoj. The Parallax View. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2006. p. 10.