Difference between revisions of "Dompte-regard"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Here, he asserts the split between the [[eye]] and the [[gaze]] when he analyzes [[Holbein]]'s [[The Ambassadors]] as a "trap for the gaze" (''piège à regards''), but also as a ''dompte-regard'' (the gaze is tamed by an [[object]]) and a ''trompe-l'oeil''.  
+
Here, he asserts the split between the [[eye]] and the [[gaze]] when he analyzes [[Holbein]]'s [[The Ambassadors]] as a "trap for the gaze" (''piège à regards''), but also as a ''dompte-regard'' (the gaze is tamed by an [[object]]) and a ''[[trompe 'loeil|trompe-l'oeil]]''.  
 
In the foreground, a floating object, a [[phallus|phallic]] ghost object gives presence to the - F of [[castration]].  
 
In the foreground, a floating object, a [[phallus|phallic]] ghost object gives presence to the - F of [[castration]].  
 
This object is the heart of the organization of [[desire]] through the framework of the [[drive]]s.
 
This object is the heart of the organization of [[desire]] through the framework of the [[drive]]s.
 +
 +
 +
dompte-regard and trompe l' (lil, 109, 111-12<ref>[[Seminar XI]]</ref>
 +
 +
==References==
 +
<references/>
  
 
==See Also==
 
==See Also==

Revision as of 11:48, 31 May 2006

Here, he asserts the split between the eye and the gaze when he analyzes Holbein's The Ambassadors as a "trap for the gaze" (piège à regards), but also as a dompte-regard (the gaze is tamed by an object) and a trompe-l'oeil. In the foreground, a floating object, a phallic ghost object gives presence to the - F of castration. This object is the heart of the organization of desire through the framework of the drives.


dompte-regard and trompe l' (lil, 109, 111-12[1]

References

See Also