Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Historical Truth

16 bytes added, 23:32, 24 May 2019
The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).
The [[idea]] of historical truth is very important in [[psychoanalysis]], because it makes it possible to take off from a realistic conception of the [[analytic]] [[process]], as it was present in Freud's early [[theory]] centered around [[trauma]], and move toward a more refined, perspective-based conception where the main focus is on the notion of construction and the process of an indirect confirmation of the construction by the [[analysand]], who can thus give it a truth [[value]], even in the [[absence]] of a recovered [[memory]]. However, the notion of truth remains dependent upon a [[feeling]] of [[certainty]]. It is not [[formal]], in the [[sense]] that it could be considered to be the same [[thing]] as exactness.
Two factors must be taken into account here. The first relates to what Freud called [[intellectual]] feeling and concerns the degree of conviction brought by an isolated and [[repressed]] piece of truth that returns. This "kernel of truth," a veritable fossil, is the basis for the irresistible claim to truth contained in [[religious]] [[faith]] as well as in delusional beliefs. This is a "historical" truth, that is, the truth of both the fossil kernel and the sense [[The Subject|the subject ]] may have of the process of [[distortion]] that is attached to it. In [[Moses and Monotheism]]: Three Essays, Freud wrote: "An idea such as this has a compulsive [[character]]: it must be believed. To the extent to which it is distorted, it may be described as a [[delusion]]; in so far as it brings a [[return]] of the past, it must be called the truth" (p. 130). "Historical truth" is thus revealed to be distinct from historical exactitude when the latter does not involve this passage by way of the repressed, and the truth is not implicit in historical narration, for this is, on the contrary, the site of compromise and dissimulation, which this time are [[conscious]]. However, as Freud wrote in Moses and Monotheism: "In its implications the distortion of a [[text]] resembles a [[murder]]: the difficulty is not in perpetrating the deed, but in getting rid of its traces" (p. 43); the only possibility is thus to follow these guiding fossils (Leitfossil) that open a pathway toward truth through these distortions.
In "Constructions in Analysis," the [[dialectic]] concerning truth is even more subtle, since an erroneous construction can lead the [[patient]] to [[remember]] a fragment of his or her historical truth. In this [[case]], said Freud, citing [[Shakespeare]]'s Polonius, it is as if "our bait of falsehood had taken a carp of truth" (p. 262). The work of [[interpretation]] thus entails freeing the fossil from the aggregate of current material encasing it and bringing it back to the point in the past to which it belongs.
Anonymous user

Navigation menu