Difference between revisions of "Libido"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In [[psychoanalysis]], the term "[[libido]]" is used to describe a mental -- psychic and emotional -- energy associated with [[instinct]]ual [[biology|biological]] [[drive]]s. | In [[psychoanalysis]], the term "[[libido]]" is used to describe a mental -- psychic and emotional -- energy associated with [[instinct]]ual [[biology|biological]] [[drive]]s. | ||
+ | ==Sigmund Freud== | ||
− | + | The term "[[libido]]" was introduced into [[psychoanalytic theory]] by [[Freud]]. | |
− | |||
− | + | [[Freud]] often employs metaphors from the [[science]] of hydraulics to describe [[libido]]. | |
− | + | It is said to be quantifiable, plastic and adhesive, and can be attached to or withdrawn from [[object]]s thanks to the mechanism of [[cathexis]]. | |
+ | It can be desexualized or used in [[sublimation]]. | ||
− | + | [[Freud]] conceives of the [[libido]] as a quantitative (or "economic") concept: it is an energy which can increase or descrease, and which can be displaced.<ref>[[Freud|Freud, Sigmund]]. SE XVIII. 1921c. p.90.</ref> | |
− | |||
− | + | ===Sexual Desire=== | |
− | + | [[Freud]] insisted on the sexual nature of this energy. | |
− | + | [[Libido]] is a specifically sexual energy. | |
+ | [[Libido]] is also described by Freud as being active and masculine. | ||
− | [[Freud]] | + | Throughout his work, [[Freud]] maintained a dualism in which the [[libido]] is opposed to another (non-sexual) form of energy. |
− | [[Freud]] | + | [[Freud]] made a distinction between the sexual or libidinal drives and the self-preservation of ego drives. |
===Carl Jung=== | ===Carl Jung=== | ||
+ | One of the major sources of the disagreement between [[Freud]] and [[Jung]] is the later's tendency to desexualize the concept of [[libido]] and to dissolve it into a more general category of mental energy. | ||
+ | |||
[[Jung]] opposed this dualism, positing a single form of life-energy which is neutral in character, and proposed that this energy be denoted by the term "[[libido]]." | [[Jung]] opposed this dualism, positing a single form of life-energy which is neutral in character, and proposed that this energy be denoted by the term "[[libido]]." | ||
Line 31: | Line 34: | ||
[[Lacan]] uses the term 'libido' very sparingly, and tends to discuss sexuality in terms of [[desire]] and ''[[jouissance]]''. | [[Lacan]] uses the term 'libido' very sparingly, and tends to discuss sexuality in terms of [[desire]] and ''[[jouissance]]''. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In general [[Lacan]] does not use the term "[[libido]]" anywhere near as frequently as [[Freud]], preferring to reconceptualize sexual energy in terms of ''[[jouissance]]''. | ||
[[Lacan]] rejects [[Jung]]'s monism and reaffirms [[Freud]]'s dualism.<ref>{{S1}} p.119-20</ref> | [[Lacan]] rejects [[Jung]]'s monism and reaffirms [[Freud]]'s dualism.<ref>{{S1}} p.119-20</ref> | ||
Line 37: | Line 42: | ||
[[Lacan]] also follows [[Freud]] in affirming that the [[libido]] is exclusively [[masculine]].<ref>{{E}} p.291</ref> | [[Lacan]] also follows [[Freud]] in affirming that the [[libido]] is exclusively [[masculine]].<ref>{{E}} p.291</ref> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Imaginary and the Real=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the 1950s [[Lacan]] locates the [[libido]] in the [[imaginary order]]. | ||
<blockquote>"Libido and the ego are on the same side. Narcissism is libidinal."<ref>{{S2}} p.326</ref></blockquote> | <blockquote>"Libido and the ego are on the same side. Narcissism is libidinal."<ref>{{S2}} p.326</ref></blockquote> | ||
From 1964 on, however, there is a shift to articulating the [[libido]] more with the [[real]].<ref>{{Ec}} p.848-9</ref> | From 1964 on, however, there is a shift to articulating the [[libido]] more with the [[real]].<ref>{{Ec}} p.848-9</ref> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
Line 50: | Line 57: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
+ | [[Category:Psychoanalysis]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Jacques Lacan]] | ||
[[Category:Dictionary]] | [[Category:Dictionary]] | ||
− | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Sexuality]] |
+ | [[Category:Concepts]] | ||
[[Category:Terms]] | [[Category:Terms]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 18:30, 4 August 2006
In psychoanalysis, the term "libido" is used to describe a mental -- psychic and emotional -- energy associated with instinctual biological drives.
Contents
Sigmund Freud
The term "libido" was introduced into psychoanalytic theory by Freud.
Freud often employs metaphors from the science of hydraulics to describe libido.
It is said to be quantifiable, plastic and adhesive, and can be attached to or withdrawn from objects thanks to the mechanism of cathexis.
It can be desexualized or used in sublimation.
Freud conceives of the libido as a quantitative (or "economic") concept: it is an energy which can increase or descrease, and which can be displaced.[1]
Sexual Desire
Freud insisted on the sexual nature of this energy.
Libido is a specifically sexual energy.
Libido is also described by Freud as being active and masculine.
Throughout his work, Freud maintained a dualism in which the libido is opposed to another (non-sexual) form of energy.
Freud made a distinction between the sexual or libidinal drives and the self-preservation of ego drives.
Carl Jung
One of the major sources of the disagreement between Freud and Jung is the later's tendency to desexualize the concept of libido and to dissolve it into a more general category of mental energy.
Jung opposed this dualism, positing a single form of life-energy which is neutral in character, and proposed that this energy be denoted by the term "libido."
Jacques Lacan
Lacan uses the term 'libido' very sparingly, and tends to discuss sexuality in terms of desire and jouissance.
In general Lacan does not use the term "libido" anywhere near as frequently as Freud, preferring to reconceptualize sexual energy in terms of jouissance.
Lacan rejects Jung's monism and reaffirms Freud's dualism.[2]
He argues, with Freud, that the libido is exclusively sexual.
Lacan also follows Freud in affirming that the libido is exclusively masculine.[3]
Imaginary and the Real
In the 1950s Lacan locates the libido in the imaginary order.
"Libido and the ego are on the same side. Narcissism is libidinal."[4]
From 1964 on, however, there is a shift to articulating the libido more with the real.[5]
See Also
References
- ↑ Freud, Sigmund. SE XVIII. 1921c. p.90.
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book I. Freud's Papers on Technique, 1953-54. Trans. John Forrester. New York: Nortion; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. p.119-20
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.291
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book II. The Ego in Freud's Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis, 1954-55. Trans. Sylvana Tomaselli. New York: Nortion; Cambridge: Cambridge Unviersity Press, 1988. p.326
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Écrits. Paris: Seuil, 1966. p.848-9