Difference between revisions of "Linguistics and Psychoanalysis"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
In 1890 the "science of language" had not yet become "general linguistics," the "fundamental science" of the humanities it would become following the work of Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913). Philologists studied <i>scripta</i> (written traces) and the history of languages but not their origins or that of the original language (<i>Ursprache</i>), a search that was felt to be irrelevant to the science of language, according to the first article of the bylaws of the Société linguistique de Paris, composed in 1866.</p>
+
In 1890 the "[[science]] of [[language]]" had not yet become "general [[linguistics]]," the "fundamental science" of the humanities it would become following the [[work]] of Ferdinand de [[Saussure]] (1857-1913). Philologists studied <i>scripta</i> (written traces) and the [[history]] of [[languages]] but not their origins or that of the original language (<i>Ursprache</i>), a [[search]] that was felt to be irrelevant to the science of language, according to the first article of the bylaws of the Société [[linguistique]] de [[Paris]], composed in 1866.</p>
 
<p>From the point of view...</p>
 
<p>From the point of view...</p>
  

Latest revision as of 01:01, 26 May 2019

In 1890 the "science of language" had not yet become "general linguistics," the "fundamental science" of the humanities it would become following the work of Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913). Philologists studied scripta (written traces) and the history of languages but not their origins or that of the original language (Ursprache), a search that was felt to be irrelevant to the science of language, according to the first article of the bylaws of the Société linguistique de Paris, composed in 1866.

From the point of view...