Difference between revisions of "Looking Awry"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | * {{Z}} ''[[Looking Awry|Looking Awry: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan through Popular Culture]]''. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991. | |
| − | + | ==Review== | |
| + | : ''By [http://www.lacan.com/zizekchro2.htm Tony Myers]'' | ||
| + | This text is often cited as the easiest of Zizek's books to navigate, a reputation underscored by the many and varied references to popular culture he makes throughout the text. | ||
| − | + | However, as Zizek admits, this book should probably be subtitled "Everything He Wasn't Able to Put into The Sublime Object". | |
| − | + | ||
| + | Therefore, unless you already understand the Lacanian concepts of the Real and jouissance (the two aspects of Lacan's work upon which he concentrates here), then some of the analyses will seem unnecessarily foreshortened. | ||
| + | |||
| + | If, on the other hand, you read The Sublime Object of Ideology first, you will be better able to grasp the subtleties of his arguments concerning detective fiction, pornography, democracy and Hitchcock. | ||
{{Footer Books Slavoj Žižek}} | {{Footer Books Slavoj Žižek}} | ||
| Line 10: | Line 15: | ||
[[Category:Works by Slavoj Žižek]] | [[Category:Works by Slavoj Žižek]] | ||
[[Category:Works]] | [[Category:Works]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Looking Awry]] | ||
Revision as of 04:03, 28 August 2006
- Žižek, Slavoj. Looking Awry: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan through Popular Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1991.
Review
- By Tony Myers
This text is often cited as the easiest of Zizek's books to navigate, a reputation underscored by the many and varied references to popular culture he makes throughout the text.
However, as Zizek admits, this book should probably be subtitled "Everything He Wasn't Able to Put into The Sublime Object".
Therefore, unless you already understand the Lacanian concepts of the Real and jouissance (the two aspects of Lacan's work upon which he concentrates here), then some of the analyses will seem unnecessarily foreshortened.
If, on the other hand, you read The Sublime Object of Ideology first, you will be better able to grasp the subtleties of his arguments concerning detective fiction, pornography, democracy and Hitchcock.
