Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Martin Heidegger

184 bytes removed, 15:36, 14 May 2006
no edit summary
 
25, 26-7, 2-9, 48, 58, 60, 135-6 Conversations
 
{{POV-check}}
 
{{Infobox_Philosopher |
<!-- Scroll down to edit this page -->
<!-- Philosopher Category -->
region = Western Philosophers |
era = [[20th-century philosophy]] |
color = #B0C4DE |
 
<!-- Image and Caption -->
image_name = Heidegger.jpeg |
image_caption = Martin Heidegger |
 
<!-- Information -->
name = Martin Heidegger |
birth = [[September 26]], [[1889]] ([[Messkirch|Meßkirch]], [[Germany]]) |
death = [[May 26]], [[1976]] ([[Messkirch|Meßkirch]], [[Germany]]) |
school_tradition = [[Phenomenology]], [[Existentialism]] |
main_interests = [[Metaphysics]], [[Epistemology]], [[Greek philosophy]], [[technology]], [[Ontology]] |
influences = [[Pre-Socratics]], [[Plato]], [[Aristotle]], [[Immanuel Kant|Kant]], [[Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel|Hegel]], [[Søren Kierkegaard|Kierkegaard]], [[Friedrich Nietzsche|Nietzsche]], [[Edmund Husserl|Husserl]] |
influenced = [[Jean-Paul Sartre]], [[Jacques Derrida]], [[Maurice Merleau-Ponty]] [[Michel Foucault]] |
notable_ideas = [[Dasein]], [[Gestell]] |
}}
'''Martin Heidegger''' ([[September 26]], [[1889]] &ndash; [[May 26]], [[1976]]) was a [[Germany|German]] [[philosopher]].
Lacoue-Labarthe and [[Jacques Derrida]] have both commented extensively on Heidegger's corpus, and both have identified an idiomatically Heideggerian National Socialism that persisted until the end. It is perhaps of greater importance that Lacoue-Labarthe and Derrida, following Celan to a degree, also believed Heidegger capable of a profound criticism of Nazism and the horrors it brought forth. They consider Heidegger's greatest failure not to be his involvement in the National Socialist movement but his "silence on the extermination" (Lacoue-Labarthe) and his refusal to engage in a thorough deconstruction of Nazism beyond laying out certain of his considerable objections to party orthodoxies and (particularly in the case of Lacoue-Labarthe) their passage through [[Nietzsche]], [[Hölderlin]], and [[Richard Wagner]], all taken to be susceptible to Nazi appropriation. It would be reasonable to say that both Lacoue-Labarthe and Derrida regarded Heidegger as capable of confronting Nazism in this more radical fashion and have themselves undertaken such work on the basis of this. (One ought to note in due course the questions Derrida raised in "Desistance," calling attention to Lacoue-Labarthe's parenthetical comment: "(in any case, Heidegger never avoids anything)").
 
==Notes==
25, 26-7, 2-9, 48, 58, 60, 135-6 Conversations
 
==Americanism and Communism==
<blockquote><ref>Žižek, S. (2000) [[The Fragile Absolute]], or Why the Christian Legacy is Worth Fighting For, London and New York: Verso. p.16</ref></blockquote>
 
==Errancy/Untruth==
<blockquote><ref>Žižek, S. (2000) [[The Fragile Absolute]], or Why the Christian Legacy is Worth Fighting For, London and New York: Verso. p.78, 80, 81-2</ref></blockquote>
 
==''Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics''==
<blockquote><ref>Žižek, S. (2000) [[The Fragile Absolute]], or Why the Christian Legacy is Worth Fighting For, London and New York: Verso. p.86</ref></blockquote>
 
==''Letter on Humanism''==
<blockquote><ref>Žižek, S. (2000) [[The Fragile Absolute]], or Why the Christian Legacy is Worth Fighting For, London and New York: Verso. p. 82</ref></blockquote>
 
==References==
<references/>
 
==See Also==
 
==See also==
Root Admin, Bots, Bureaucrats, flow-bot, oversight, Administrators, Widget editors
24,656
edits

Navigation menu