Difference between revisions of "Memory"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | The term "[[memory]]" ([[Fr]]. ''[[mémoire]]'') is used in two different ways in [[Lacan]]'s [[Works of Jacques Lacan|work]]. | ||
| − | + | ==Symbolic Concept== | |
| − | + | In the 1950s, [[memory]] is understood as a phenomenon of the [[symbolic order]], related to the [[signifying chain]]. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
It is related to the concepts of [[remembering]] and [[recollection]], and opposed to [[imaginary]] reminiscence. | It is related to the concepts of [[remembering]] and [[recollection]], and opposed to [[imaginary]] reminiscence. | ||
| − | + | ===Not a Biological or Psychological Concept=== | |
[[Lacan]] makes it clear that his concept of [[memory]] is not a [[biological]] or [[psychology|psychological]] one. | [[Lacan]] makes it clear that his concept of [[memory]] is not a [[biological]] or [[psychology|psychological]] one. | ||
| Line 15: | Line 14: | ||
For [[psychoanalysis]], [[memory]] is the [[symbolic]] [[history]] of the [[subject]], a [[chain]] of [[signifier]]s linked up together, a "signifying articulation."<ref>{{S7}} p.223</ref> | For [[psychoanalysis]], [[memory]] is the [[symbolic]] [[history]] of the [[subject]], a [[chain]] of [[signifier]]s linked up together, a "signifying articulation."<ref>{{S7}} p.223</ref> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Something is memorable and memorized only when something goes wrong with [[memory]], when the subject cannot recall a part of his [[history]]. | Something is memorable and memorized only when something goes wrong with [[memory]], when the subject cannot recall a part of his [[history]]. | ||
| Line 22: | Line 19: | ||
It is the fact that he can forget, that a [[signifier]] can be elided from the [[signifying chain]], that makes the psychoanalytic [[subject]] distinctive.<ref>{{S7}} p.224</ref> | It is the fact that he can forget, that a [[signifier]] can be elided from the [[signifying chain]], that makes the psychoanalytic [[subject]] distinctive.<ref>{{S7}} p.224</ref> | ||
| + | ==Biological or Physiological Concept== | ||
| + | In the 1960s [[Lacan]] reserves the term "memory" for the [[biological]] or [[physiological]] concept of [[memory]] as an organic property.<ref>{{Ec}} p.42</ref> | ||
| + | It thus no longer designates the [[symbolic]] [[history]] of the [[subject]] which is the concern of [[psychoanalysis]], but something which lies outside [[psychoanalysis]] altogether. | ||
| + | ==References== | ||
| + | <references/> | ||
| − | + | [[Category:Dictionary]] | |
| − | + | [[Category:Psychoanalysis]] | |
| − | + | [[Category:Jacques Lacan]] | |
| + | [[Category:Concepts]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Terms]] | ||
Revision as of 19:29, 30 July 2006
The term "memory" (Fr. mémoire) is used in two different ways in Lacan's work.
Contents
Symbolic Concept
In the 1950s, memory is understood as a phenomenon of the symbolic order, related to the signifying chain.
It is related to the concepts of remembering and recollection, and opposed to imaginary reminiscence.
Not a Biological or Psychological Concept
Lacan makes it clear that his concept of memory is not a biological or psychological one.
"The memory which interests psychoanalysis is quite distinct from what psychologists speak of when they display its mechanism to us in an animate being in an experiment."[1]
For psychoanalysis, memory is the symbolic history of the subject, a chain of signifiers linked up together, a "signifying articulation."[2]
Something is memorable and memorized only when something goes wrong with memory, when the subject cannot recall a part of his history.
It is the fact that he can forget, that a signifier can be elided from the signifying chain, that makes the psychoanalytic subject distinctive.[3]
Biological or Physiological Concept
In the 1960s Lacan reserves the term "memory" for the biological or physiological concept of memory as an organic property.[4]
It thus no longer designates the symbolic history of the subject which is the concern of psychoanalysis, but something which lies outside psychoanalysis altogether.
References
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book III. The Psychoses, 1955-56. Trans. Russell Grigg. London: Routledge, 1993. p.152
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book VII. The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959-60. Trans. Dennis Porter. London: Routledge, 1992. p.223
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book VII. The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959-60. Trans. Dennis Porter. London: Routledge, 1992. p.224
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Écrits. Paris: Seuil, 1966. p.42
