|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | | + | #redirect [[partial object]] |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | part-object (objet partiel)
| |
| − | According to Melanie Klein, the infant's underdeveloped capacity for perception, together with the fact that he is only concerned with his immediate gratifications, means that the subject begins by relating only to a part of a person rather than the whole. The primordial part- object is, according to Klein, the mother's breast. As the child's visual apparatus develops, so also does his capacity to perceive people as whole objects rather than collections of separate parts (see Hinshelwood, 1989: 378- 80).
| |
| − | While the term 'part-object' was first introduced by the Kleinian school of psychoanalysis, the origins of the concept can be traced back to Karl Abraham's work and ultimately to Freud. For example, when Freud states that partial drives are directed towards objects such as the breast or faeces, these are clearly part-objects. Freud also implies that the penis is a part-object in his discussion of the [[CASTRATION COMPLEX]] (in which the penis is imagined as a separable organ) and in his discussion of fetishism (see Laplanche and Pontalis, 1967: 301).
| |
| − | The concept of the part-object plays an important part in Lacan's work from early on. Lacan finds the concept of the part-object particularly useful in his criticism of object-relations theory, which he attacks for attributing a false sense of completeness to the object. In opposition to this tendency, Lacan argues that just as all [[Drive]]s are partial drives, so all objects are necessarily partial objects.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Lacan's focus on the part-object is clear evidence of the important Kleinian influences in his work. However, whereas Klein defines these objects as partial because they are only part of a whole object, Lacan takes a different view.
| |
| − | They are partial, he argues, 'not because these objects are part of a total object, the body, but because they represent only partially the function that produces - them' (E, 315). In other words, in the unconscious only the pleasure-giving - function of these objects is represented, while their biological function is not represented. Furthermore, Lacan argues that what isolates certain parts of the body as a part-object is not any biological given but the signifying system of language.
| |
| − | In addition to the partial objects already discovered by psychoanalytic theory before Lacan (the breast, the faeces, the [[Phallus]] BS [[Imaginary]] object, and the urinary flow), Lacan adds (in 1960) several more: the phoneme, the [[Gaze]], the voice and the nothing (E, 315). Thesgobjects all have one feature in common: 'they have no specular image' (E, 315). In other words, they are precisely that which cannot be assimilated into the subject's narcissistic illusion of completeness.
| |
| − | Lacan's conceptualisation of the part-object is modified with the development around 1963-4 of the concept of OBJETPETITA as the cause of desire. Now each partial object becomes an object by virtue of the fact that the subject takes it for the object of desire, objet petit a (Sll, 104 From this point on in his work, Lacan usually restricts his discussion of part-objects to only four: the voice, the [[Gaze]], the breast and faeces.
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | == References ==
| |
| − | <references/>
| |
| − | | |
| − | [[Category:Lacan]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Terms]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Concepts]]
| |
| − | [[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
| |
