[[Image:Sem1.jpg{{SeminarsNavBar|thumbRightPrevLink=|200pxRightPrevText=|rightRightNextLink=Seminar II|'''Le séminaire, Livre I: Les écrits techniques de Freud''']]RightNextText=Seminar II|RightMainLink=Seminar XIV|RightMainText=Seminar XIV}}
{| classalign="wikitablecenter" style="width:100%600px; border:1px solid #aaa;text-align:left; line-height:200px2.0em; padding-left:10px;"|-| style="width:150px; text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;"| [[{{Y}}|1953 - 1954]]! | style="width:150px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" |Seminar I| 1953style="width:300px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-4 left:10px;" |''[[Seminar I| Les écrits techniques de Freud]]''[[Seminar I|<big>Freud's Papers on Technique</big>]].<BR> ''Les écrits techniques de Freud''.
|}
* ''Le séminaire, Livre [[Image:Sem.I.jpg|border|300px|right]]{{SeminarBox|title = Seminar I: |image = Seminar_I_Freud%27s_Papers_on_Technique.jpg|Years = 1953 - 1954|French = Les écrits techniques de Freud''. (1953-1954) Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1973.* ''The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book I: |English = Freud's Papers on Technique, 1953-1954''. Ed. J.-A. Miller. Trans. J. Forrester. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.|Download = |Mirror = }}
{| class="toccolours" <span style="float: right; clearline-height: right; margin: 0 0 02.5em 1em0em;"|+ style="font-size: larger; margin-left: 1.1em;"||>The first [[seminar]], open to the public, takes place at Sainte- style="vertical-align: top;"|style="background: #CCCCCC;" colspan="3" align=center|'''Download'''|- style="vertical-align: top;"|* Anne Hospital just after the creation of the [[http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1953Société Française de Psychanalyse]] (S.11F.18P.pdf 1954).11.18.pdf [[Lacan]]* intervenes in the study of [[httpFreud]] by deploying his concepts of the three 'registers' of subjective experience://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954the [[imaginary]], the [[symbolic]] and the [[real]].01 The focal point of the discussion is the direction of the [[cure]].13 Participants are allowed to make presentations, comments and objections.pdf 1954 Through the [[case]] histories of [[Freud]], [[Klein]], [[Kris]] and [[Balint]], the debate elucidates on the convergence of [[psychoanalysis]], [[philosophy]], [[theology]], [[linguistics]] and [[game theory]].01.13.pdfIn keeping with this heterogeneous approach, [[Lacan]] will further appeal to the [[science]] of [[optics]]* to systematize his analyses of the [[http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954specular relation]].01.20.pdf 1954.01.20.pdf After his [[schema]]* of the [[http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.01.27.pdf 1954.01.27.pdfinverted bouquet]]* the [[http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.02.03.pdf 1954.02.03.pdfmirror stage]]* becomes part of the topography of the [[http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954Imaginary]].02.10.pdf 1954.02.10.pdfAs to the ''[[méconnaissance]]* '' that characterizes the [[http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.02.17.pdf 1954.02.17.pdfego]]* , it is associated with ''[http[Negation|Verneinung]]'' (''dénégation'')://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954".02.24.pdf 1954.02.24.pdfeveryday [[speech]]* runs against failure of [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.03.10.pdf 1954.03.10.pdf[recognition]]* , ''[http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.03.17.pdf 1954.03.17.pdf[méconnaissance]]* '', which is the source of ''[http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954[Verneinung]]''.03.24.pdf 1954.03.24.pdf" He closes the [[seminar]]* pondering on the [[http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.03.31.pdf 1954.03.31.pdfrole]]* of the [[httpanalyst]]://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954''".04.07.pdf 1954.04.07.pdfif [[The Subject|the subject]]* commits himself to searching after [[http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.05.05.pdf 1954.05.05.pdftruth]]* as such, it is because he places himself in the [[http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.05.12.pdf 1954.05.12.pdfdimension]]* of [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.05.19.pdf 1954.05.19.pdf[ignorance]]* , what [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.05.26.pdf 1954.05.26.pdf[analyst]]* s call readiness to the [[http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954transference]].06 The [[analyst]]'s ignorance is also worthy of consideration.02.pdf 1954.06.02.pdf He doesn't have to [[guide]]* the [[http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.06.09.pdf 1954.06.09.pdfsubject]]* to [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.06.16.pdf 1954.06.16.pdf[knowledge]]* , but onto the paths by which access to this [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954[knowledge]] is gained.06.23.pdf 1954.06.23.pdf [[Psychoanalysis]]* is a [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.06.30.pdf 1954.06.30.pdf[dialectic]]* s, an [[http:art]] of conversation."''<//{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.07.07.pdf 1954.07.07.pdf]|}span>
<span style="line-height:2.0em;font-size:1.1em">In a spoken [[Lacanintervention]] (Appendix), [[Jean Hyppolite]] comments on [[Freud]]'s first ''[[Negation|Verneinung]]'' and suggests its [[translation]] as ''dénégation'' instead of ''négation''. The question here deals with how the [[seminarreturn of the repressed]] -- open operates. According to [[Freud]], the [[repress]]ed is intellectually accepted by the public -- [[subject]], since it is held named, and at the same [[Sainte-Anne Hospitaltime]] soon after the establishment of is negated because the [[subject]] refuses to recognize it as his, refuses to recognize himself in it. ''Dénégation'' includes an assertion whose status is difficult to define. The frontier between [[neurosis]] and [[psychosis]] is drawn here, between [[repression]], ''Verdrägung'', and [[repudiation]], ''Verwerfung'', a term that [[Société Française de PsychanalyseLacan]]will replace with 'withdrawal' , and finally with "[[foreclosure]]" (''forclusion''), the former being related to [[SFPneurosis]], the latter to [[psychosis]]). </span>
This <span style="line-height:2.0em;font-size:1.1em">When answering Hyppolite in La [[seminarPsychanalyse]] is explicitly addressed to analyststhat same year, as it concerns questions of psychoanalytic technique, those [[Lacan]] establishes two poles of [[resistanceanalytic experience]]: the [[imaginary]] [[ego]] and the [[symbolic]] [[speech]]. [[Lacan]] gives precedence to the [[Symbolic]] over the [[Imaginary]], . The subject who must come to be is "the [[defencesubject of the unconscious]], " where here it is to be understood that "the [[repressionunconscious is the discourse of the Other]] and ." In [[transferenceanalysis]], he says, "the subject first talks about himself without talking to you, then he talks to you without talking about himself. When he is able to talk to you about himself, the analysis is over."</span>
It also contains his early formulation <span style="line-height:2.0em;font-size:1.1em">To this reshaping of the [[Imaginary]] by the [[Symbolic]], he opposes the intersection of the imaginary [[Symbolic]] and his critique the [[Real]] without mediation of the Object Relations School [[Imaginary]], which would be the characteristic of psychoanalysis[[psychosis]].</span>
== Downloads =={| class="wikitable sortable" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="width:100%;"![[Author]](s)!Title!Publisher!Year!Pages![[Language]]!Size!Filetype!Downloads|-|[[Jacques Lacan]] cuts in the study |[[The Seminar of Jacques Lacan: Freud's Papers on Technique (Seminar I)]]<small>9780393306972</small>| class="s4" |W. W. Norton & Company|<small>1991</small>|<small>312</small>|<small>[[English]]</small>|<small>4 Mb</small>|<big>djvu</big>|[http://library1.org/_ads/5B4D56FA644161D57238A9E4732F4F1D 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=5B4D56FA644161D57238A9E4732F4F1D 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/5B4D56FA644161D57238A9E4732F4F1D 3], [Freudhttp://libgen.me/item/detail/id/436617 4], [http://bookfi.net/md5/5B4D56FA644161D57238A9E4732F4F1D 5]|-|[[Jacques Lacan|Jacques Lacan]] by dint |[[The Seminar of his theory Jacques Lacan: Freud's Papers on the Technique (Seminar I)]]|W. W. Norton & Company|<small>1991</small>|<small>312</small>|<small>English</small>|<small>23 Mb</small>|<big>pdf</big>|[http://library1.org/_ads/C1ECD480977DAAE3E35B5B261B4DD3B8 1], [imaginaryhttps://ulozto.net/file/9UYPScorSNa0/jacques-lacan-seminar-i-lacan-seminar-1-technique-pdf 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/C1ECD480977DAAE3E35B5B261B4DD3B8 3], the [http://bookfi.net/md5/C1ECD480977DAAE3E35B5B261B4DD3B8 4]|-|[[symbolicJacques Lacan|Jacques Lacan]] and the |''Das Seminar von [[realJacques lacan|Jacques Lacan]]Buch 1 (1953-1954)''Freuds technische Schriften''<small>9783530502138, 3530502138</small>''|<small>Walter</small>|<small>1978</small>|<small>364</small><small>[363]</small>|<small>[[German]]</small>|<small>9 Mb</small>|<big>pdf</big>|[http://library1.org/_ads/F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 3], [http://libgen. me/item/detail/id/2208994 4], [http://bookfi.net/md5/F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 5]|}
The focal point === Related ==={| class="wikitable sortable" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="width:100%;"|Richard Feldstein, [[Bruce Fink]], Maire Jaanus|''<sup>SUNY Series in Psychoanalysis & [[Culture]]</sup>''[[Reading]] [[Seminars]] I and II: Lacan’s [[Return to Freud]]|[[State]] [[University]] of the discussion is the direction New York Press|1996|460[445]|English|3 Mb|pdf|[http://library1.org/_ads/7B5AA1FD77827BE2863C11DDBF71A1F3 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=7B5AA1FD77827BE2863C11DDBF71A1F3 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/7B5AA1FD77827BE2863C11DDBF71A1F3 3], [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/2113769 4], [http://bookfi.net/md5/7B5AA1FD77827BE2863C11DDBF71A1F3 5]|-|Richard Feldstein, Bruce Fink, Maire Jaanus|''<small>SUNY Series in Psychoanalysis & Culture</small>''Reading Seminars I and II: Lacan’s [[Return to freud|Return to Freud]]|State University of the New York Press|1996|445|English|7 Mb|pdf|[http://library1.org/_ads/3CBBB510FD49D6C8591E58329A8FBC8F 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=3CBBB510FD49D6C8591E58329A8FBC8F 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/3CBBB510FD49D6C8591E58329A8FBC8F 3], [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/2245094 4], [http://bookfi.net/md5/3CBBB510FD49D6C8591E58329A8FBC8F 5]|-|Richard [[Boothby]]|Death and Desire: Psychoanalytic Theory in Lacan's Return to Freud <small>[1 ed.]</small>|<small>Routledge</small>|<small>1991</small>|<small>276</small>|<small>English</small>|<small>4 Mb</small>|<big>djvu</big>|[http://library1.org/_ads/FC981853F7D4392251AC2F7654698ED0 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=FC981853F7D4392251AC2F7654698ED0 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/FC981853F7D4392251AC2F7654698ED0 3], [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/1267554 4], [http://bookfi.net/md5/FC981853F7D4392251AC2F7654698ED0 5]|-|[[Jacques lacan|Jacques Lacan]]|[http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=C4C1C8076674F191942740191C6DE894 La cosa freudiana e altri scritti]|<small>Einaudi</small>|<small>1972</small>|<small>252</small>|<small>Italian</small>|<small>8 Mb</small>|<big>pdf</big>|[http://library1.org/_ads/C4C1C8076674F191942740191C6DE894 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=C4C1C8076674F191942740191C6DE894 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/C4C1C8076674F191942740191C6DE894 3], [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/926138 4], [http://bookfi.net/md5/C4C1C8076674F191942740191C6DE894 5]|-|[[Jacques Lacan]]|''Das Seminar von [[cureJacques lacan|Jacques Lacan]]Buch 1 (1953-1954)''''Freuds technische Schriften''''<small>9783530502138, 3530502138</small>''|<small>Walter</small>|<small>1978</small>|<small>364</small><small>[363]</small>|'''German'''|<small>9 Mb</small>|<big>pdf</big>|[http://library1. org/_ads/F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 3], [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/2208994 4], [http://bookfi.net/md5/F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 5]|}
Through the case histories of Freud, Klein, Kris and Balint, the debate elucidates on the convergence of [[psychoanalysis]], [[philosophy]], [[theology]], [[linguistics]] and [[game theory]]==French=={| class="floatright" style="float:right;margin-left:10px"| {| class="wikitable" width="210px" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff" style="float:right; margin-left: 10px;margin-right:0px;line-height:2. 0em; padding-left:60px; background:#ffffff; text-align:center;"|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" width="150px" style="padding-left:10px;" align="center" | Date| bgcolor="#ffffff" width="30px" style="padding-left:10px;" | PDF|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:0px;" align="center" |18 novembre 1953In keeping with this heterogeneous approach, Lacan will further appeal to the | [[sciencehttps://mega.nz/#!DX52mS6I!DKvdAH3cHEOpZ8z11aEejmnl-YgrbFvkPmhBdi8Glbc pdf]] of |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 13 janvier 1954| [[opticshttps://mega.nz/#!HT4yxSAL!wBVLodWiwP2jIfz2mkNIVWQIfT3BZ3EqyRoVri05BLU pdf]] to systematize his analyses of the specular relation. |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 20 janvier 1954After his schema of the ''inverted bouquet'' the | [[mirror stagehttps://mega.nz/#!jW40FAbB!RxGknYryXSKJPsF1C_YfWKeuXqfBnOfkVKyO6Yv3hnk pdf]] becomes part of the topography of the |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 27 janvier 1954| [[Imaginaryhttps://mega.nz/#!GCp0WazS!hnPzqdW-Srgye4utQ6NAFID4pjQW5rSnRj090q7Q18Y pdf]]. |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 3 février 1954As to the ''| [[méconnaissancehttps://mega.nz/#!zbxmha6a!UXWk7cRnMx5ok13sq2w-1kzXQJ0WHFpzQY0CeejH17U pdf]]'' that characterizes the |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 10 février 1954| [[egohttps://mega.nz/#!nTpQkAJY!HeAx1sOuKqRH-KYwnAWK8fG9Pvh_feob9AC3TgTe1ZU pdf]], it is associated with ''|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 17 février 1954| [[Verneinunghttps://mega.nz/#!jKwgwIBB!QoxsGYuOToxRSQXDa6ktgDaBhSUxzC3uBbCmt7AjNvQ pdf]]'' (''dénégation'')|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left: 15px;"| 24 février 1954 | [https://mega...everyday speech runs against failure of recognition, ''méconnaissance'', which is the source of ''Verneinung''.nz/#!nCxi1Q7K!9rs9uaDqlIq2LwmilYtxuuHA4YGB0AM62H1viDbO_Ww pdf]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 10 mars 1954 He closes the seminar pondering on the role of the | [[analyst]https://mega.nz/#!fHxQiSxZ!jCbQKaIpITfEJjB13Ep-9KIwSsjW4ccp1kpZdRLMm9Y pdf]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left: 15px;"| 17 mars 1954| [https://mega...if the [[subjectnz/#!HLpUHKhC!kHDDgwC-TzSIznWGiLIpmi1uIdxoh8vr6BcPfjHhH7E pdf]] commits himself to searching after |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 24 mars 1954| [[truthhttps://mega.nz/#!uLoU3C7a!GHXZuwDDRCsmGOBvczmpX-Wj3u3pcZNgPH7zDYdiuuA pdf]] as such, it is because he places himself in the dimension of ignorance, what analysts call readiness to the |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 31 mars 1954| [[transferencehttps://mega.nz/#!2LxUBI7D!ceYLvhdVLTu-bKukMBLQElxow6ClRoxkIJjtS74NQd0 pdf]]. |}|The analyst's ignorance is also worth of consideration. He doesn't have to guide the subject to knowledge, but on to the paths by which access to this knowledge is gained. Psychoanalysis is a dialectics, an art of conversation{| class="wikitable" width="210px" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff" style="float:right; margin-left: 10px;line-height:2.0em; padding-left:60px; background:#ffffff; text-align:center;"| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 7 avril 1954In a spoken intervention (Appendix), Jean Hyppolite comments on Freud's ‘’Verneinung’’ and suggests its translation as ‘’dénégation’’ instead of ‘’négation’’| [https://mega. nz/#!LSxWkYoI!9449kB_rFnMo375EO4hgviw5DbyVmQU1F45va1vq-sc pdf]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 5 mai 1954The question here deals with how | [[the return of the repressed]https://mega.nz/#!eWxyAKBQ!k5A2JNv7FaOmp59CoUhe7VOFJ7GQ_oavUSZiZ8uM35Y pdf] operates. |-According to Freud the repressed is intellectually accepted by the subject, since it is named, and at the same time is negated because the subject refuses to recognize it as his, refuses to recognize him in it| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 12 mai 1954| [https://mega. nz/#!jfokDQqB!CFxajL1BHcJZRC_6dbWYjIYY5zHzijWSkhWKNrmpUxE pdf]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 19 mai 1954‘’Dénégation’’ includes an assertion whose status is difficult to define| [https://mega. nz/#!Pe50TaKI!gESYfwAbRijOxgHQ5_GUM5OXBmK215areo9vpBY-hQU pdf]|-The frontier between | bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 26 mai 1954| [[neurosishttps://mega.nz/#!LSgEUYxR!N6Bj2jANwGLjIywSnl95UeM051b-MsDcnn5bRHcUi_I pdf]] and |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 2 juin 1954| [[psychosishttps://mega.nz/#!KewyiYJJ!HF2UmexK6mh9ZdqB975fykjEBXubTTNolApGJW6E8rA pdf]] is drawn here, between |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 9 juin 1954| [[repressionhttps://mega.nz/#!Xa4UkajK!5Gi3YxdVEIzV7_p41LiwllJ8j6WFMY7_hjp1w1NMk_E pdf]], ‘’Verdrägung’’, and repudiation, ‘’Verwerfung’’, a term that Lacan will replace by withdrawal, and finally by |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;"| 16 juin 1954| [[foreclosure]https://mega.nz/#!nX5ASCJb!q6Vzn5RAm0HVQW2r7I8hghIv17zN9wGFMeCrAg16R8U pdf]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" (‘’forclusion’’), the former being related to neurosis, the latter to psychosis| 23 juin 1954| [https://mega.nz/#!7ChE1QQZ!GfT5BIjPCH6rHe_-oIPZiP9tfFdrtBAWRUlZ-M-hehk pdf]|-When answering Hyppolite in ‘’La Psychanalyse’’ that same year, Lacan establishes two poles of analytic experience| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left: the 15px;" | 30 juin 1954| [[imaginary]https://mega.nz/#!zewgBC7Q!UQfiri4WmZ26KNX-T_jEHH5ZFSQxlfvHyGkoYi79P-o pdf] |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 7 juillet 1954| [[egohttps://mega.nz/#!HCoEQIDS!wgRupsvSH1uZjMHCWckhc8ysiwKRjkYwEA8DQihnhwg pdf]] and the |}|}French versions of [[symbolicJacques Lacan|Lacan's]] [[speechSeminars]]Source: http://ecole-lacanienne. net Lacan gives precedence to the Symbolic over the Imaginary. The * [[subjectFile:Seminaire_01.pdf|Download]] who must come to be is <BR><pdf width="[[the subject of the unconscious]]450px" and height="[[the unconscious is the discourse of the Other]].600px" In analysis, he says, "the subject first talks about himself without talking to you, then he talks to you without talking about himself>File:Seminaire_01. When he is able to talk to you about himself, the analysis is over." To this reshaping of the Imaginary by the Symbolic, he opposes the intersection of the Symbolic and the Real without mediation of the Imaginary, which would be the characteristic of psychosis.pdf</pdf>[[Category:WorksSeminars]]
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
[[Category:Sigmund Freud]]
[[Category:Seminars]]
__NOTOC__ __NOEDITSECTION__ __NOAUTOLINKS__
