[[Image:Sem1.jpg{{SeminarsNavBar|thumbRightPrevLink=|200pxRightPrevText=|leftRightNextLink=Seminar II|'''Le séminaire, Livre I: Les écrits techniques de Freud''']]{{SeminarTitle}}kRightNextText=Seminar II|}RightMainLink=Seminar XIV|}{{AuthorRightMainText=Seminar XIV}}
{| classalign="wikitablecenter" style="width:600px; border:1px solid #aaa;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;"! |-| style="width:150px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" | [[{{Y}}|1953 - 1954]]| style="width:150px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" |Seminar I| 1953style="width:300px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-4 left:10px;" |''[[Seminar I| Les écrits techniques de Freud]]''[[Seminar I|<big>Freud's Papers on Technique</big>]].<BR> ''Les écrits techniques de Freud''.
|}
[[Image:Sem.I.jpg|border|300px|right]]
{{SeminarBox
|title = Seminar I
|image = Seminar_I_Freud%27s_Papers_on_Technique.jpg
|Years = 1953 - 1954
|French = Les écrits techniques de Freud
|English = Freud's Papers on Technique
|Download =
|Mirror =
}}
* ''Le séminaire, Livre I: Les écrits techniques de Freud''. (1953-1954) Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1973.
* ''The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book I: Freud's Papers on Technique, 1953-1954''. Ed. J.-A. Miller. Trans. J. Forrester. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
<span style="line-height:2.0em;font-size:1.1em">The first [[seminar]], open to the public, takes place at Sainte-Anne Hospital just after the creation of the [[Société Française de Psychanalyse]] (S.F.P.). [[Lacan]] intervenes in the study of [[Freud]] by deploying his concepts of the three 'registers' of subjective experience: the [[imaginary]], the [[symbolic]] and the [[real]]. The focal point of the discussion is the direction of the [[cure]]. Participants are allowed to make presentations, comments and objections. Through the [[case]] histories of [[Freud]], [[Klein]], [[Kris]] and [[Balint]], the debate elucidates on the convergence of [[psychoanalysis]], [[philosophy]], [[theology]], [[linguistics]] and [[game theory]]. In keeping with this heterogeneous approach, [[Lacan]] will further appeal to the [[science]] of [[optics]] to systematize his analyses of the [[specular relation]]. After his [[schema]] of the [[inverted bouquet]] the [[mirror stage]] becomes part of the topography of the [[Imaginary]]. As to the ''[[méconnaissance]]'' that characterizes the [[ego]], it is associated with ''[[Negation|Verneinung]]'' (''dénégation''): "...everyday [[speech]] runs against failure of [[recognition]], ''[[méconnaissance]]'', which is the source of ''[[Verneinung]]''." He closes the [[seminar]] pondering on the [[role]] of the [[analyst]]: ''"...if [[The Subject|the subject]] commits himself to searching after [[truth]] as such, it is because he places himself in the [[dimension]] of [[ignorance]], what [[analyst]]s call readiness to the [[transference]]. The [[analyst]]'s ignorance is also worthy of consideration. He doesn't have to [[guide]] the [[subject]] to [[knowledge]], but onto the paths by which access to this [[knowledge]] is gained. [[Psychoanalysis]] is a [[dialectic]]s, an [[art]] of conversation."''</span>
{| class="toccolours" <span style="float: right; paddingline-leftheight:10px;clear: right; margin: 0 0 02.5em 1em0em;"|+ style="font-size: larger; margin-left: 1.1em;">In a spoken [[intervention]] (Appendix), [[Jean Hyppolite]] comments on [[Freud]]'s ''[[Negation||- style="vertical-align: top;"|style="background: #CCCCCC;" colspan="3" align=center|Verneinung]]'' and suggests its [[translation]] as ''dénégation''instead of 'Download'négation''|- style="vertical-align: top;"|* . The question here deals with how the [[http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1953return of the repressed]] operates.11.18.pdf 1954.11.18.pdf According to [[Freud]]* , the [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.01.13.pdf 1954.01.13.pdf[repress]]* ed is intellectually accepted by the [[http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.01.20.pdf 1954.01.20.pdfsubject]]* , since it is named, and at the same [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.01.27.pdf 1954.01.27.pdf[time]]* is negated because the [[http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954subject]] refuses to recognize it as his, refuses to recognize himself in it.02 ''Dénégation'' includes an assertion whose status is difficult to define.03.pdf 1954.02.03.pdfThe frontier between [[neurosis]]* and [[http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.02.10.pdf 1954.02.10.pdfpsychosis]]* is drawn here, between [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.02.17.pdf 1954.02.17.pdf[repression]]* , ''Verdrägung'', and [[http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.02.24.pdf 1954.02.24.pdfrepudiation]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.03.10.pdf 1954.03.10.pdf]* , ''Verwerfung'', a term that [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.03.17.pdf 1954.03.17.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.03.24.pdf 1954.03.24.pdfLacan]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.03.31.pdf 1954.03.31.pdf]* will replace with 'withdrawal', and finally with "[http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.04.07.pdf 1954.04.07.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.05.05.pdf 1954.05.05.pdfforeclosure]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.05.12.pdf 1954.05.12.pdf]* " (''forclusion''), the former being related to [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.05.19.pdf 1954.05.19.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.05.26.pdf 1954.05.26.pdfneurosis]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.06.02.pdf 1954.06.02.pdf]* , the latter to [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.06.09.pdf 1954.06.09.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.06.16.pdf 1954.06.16.pdfpsychosis]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.06.23.pdf 1954.06.23.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI/1954.06.30.pdf 1954.06.30.pdf]* [http://{{Archive}}/seminaireI</1954.07.07.pdf 1954.07.07.pdf]|}span>
<span style="line-height:2.0em;font-size:1.1em">When answering Hyppolite in La [[Psychanalyse]] that same year, [[Lacan]]'s first establishes two poles of [[analytic experience]]: the [[imaginary]] [[ego]] and the [[symbolic]] [[speech]]. [[seminarLacan]] -- open gives precedence to the public -- is held at [[Sainte-Anne HospitalSymbolic]] over the [[Imaginary]] soon after . The subject who must come to be is "the establishment [[subject of the ''unconscious]]," where here it is to be understood that "the [[Société Française de Psychanalyseunconscious is the discourse of the Other]]'' (." In [[SFPanalysis]]), he says, "the subject first talks about himself without talking to you, then he talks to you without talking about himself. When he is able to talk to you about himself, the analysis is over. "</span>
This <span style="line-height:2.0em;font-size:1.1em">To this reshaping of the [[Imaginary]] by the [[seminarSymbolic]] is explicitly addressed to analysts, as it concerns questions of psychoanalytic technique, those he opposes the intersection of the [[resistanceSymbolic]], and the [[defenceReal]], without mediation of the [[repressionImaginary]] and , which would be the characteristic of [[transferencepsychosis]].</span>
It also contains his early formulation == Downloads =={| class="wikitable sortable" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="width:100%;"![[Author]](s)!Title!Publisher!Year!Pages![[Language]]!Size!Filetype!Downloads|-|[[Jacques Lacan]]|[[The Seminar of the imaginary and his critique Jacques Lacan: Freud's Papers on Technique (Seminar I)]]<small>9780393306972</small>| class="s4" |W. W. Norton & Company|<small>1991</small>|<small>312</small>|<small>[[English]]</small>|<small>4 Mb</small>|<big>djvu</big>|[http://library1.org/_ads/5B4D56FA644161D57238A9E4732F4F1D 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=5B4D56FA644161D57238A9E4732F4F1D 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/5B4D56FA644161D57238A9E4732F4F1D 3], [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/436617 4], [http://bookfi.net/md5/5B4D56FA644161D57238A9E4732F4F1D 5]|-|[[Jacques Lacan|Jacques Lacan]]|[[The Seminar of the Object Relations School of psychoanalysisJacques Lacan: Freud's Papers on Technique (Seminar I)]]|W. W. Norton & Company|<small>1991</small>|<small>312</small>|<small>English</small>|<small>23 Mb</small>|<big>pdf</big>|[http://library1.org/_ads/C1ECD480977DAAE3E35B5B261B4DD3B8 1], [https://ulozto.net/file/9UYPScorSNa0/jacques-lacan-seminar-i-lacan-seminar-1-technique-pdf 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/C1ECD480977DAAE3E35B5B261B4DD3B8 3], [http://bookfi.net/md5/C1ECD480977DAAE3E35B5B261B4DD3B8 4]|-|[[Jacques Lacan|Jacques Lacan]]|''Das Seminar von [[Jacques lacan|Jacques Lacan]] Buch 1 (1953-1954)''Freuds technische Schriften''<small>9783530502138, 3530502138</small>''|<small>Walter</small>|<small>1978</small>|<small>364</small><small>[363]</small>|<small>[[German]]</small>|<small>9 Mb</small>|<big>pdf</big>|[http://library1.org/_ads/F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 3], [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/2208994 4], [http://bookfi.net/md5/F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 5]|}
=== Related ==={| class="wikitable sortable" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="width:100%;"|Richard Feldstein, [[LacanBruce Fink]] cuts , Maire Jaanus|''<sup>SUNY Series in the study Psychoanalysis & [[Culture]]</sup>''[[Reading]] [[Seminars]] I and II: Lacan’s [[Return to Freud]]|[[State]] [[University]] of New York Press|1996|460[445]|English|3 Mb|pdf|[http://library1.org/_ads/7B5AA1FD77827BE2863C11DDBF71A1F3 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=7B5AA1FD77827BE2863C11DDBF71A1F3 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/7B5AA1FD77827BE2863C11DDBF71A1F3 3], [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/2113769 4], [http://bookfi.net/md5/7B5AA1FD77827BE2863C11DDBF71A1F3 5]|-|Richard Feldstein, Bruce Fink, Maire Jaanus|''<small>SUNY Series in Psychoanalysis & Culture</small>''Reading Seminars I and II: Lacan’s [[Return to freud|Return to Freud]] by dint |State University of his theory on the New York Press|1996|445|English|7 Mb|pdf|[http://library1.org/_ads/3CBBB510FD49D6C8591E58329A8FBC8F 1], [imaginaryhttp://libgen.io/get.php?md5=3CBBB510FD49D6C8591E58329A8FBC8F 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/3CBBB510FD49D6C8591E58329A8FBC8F 3], the [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/2245094 4], [symbolichttp://bookfi.net/md5/3CBBB510FD49D6C8591E58329A8FBC8F 5]|-|Richard [[Boothby] ]|Death and the Desire: Psychoanalytic Theory in Lacan's Return to Freud <small>[1 ed.]</small>|<small>Routledge</small>|<small>1991</small>|<small>276</small>|<small>English</small>|<small>4 Mb</small>|<big>djvu</big>|[realhttp://library1.org/_ads/FC981853F7D4392251AC2F7654698ED0 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=FC981853F7D4392251AC2F7654698ED0 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/FC981853F7D4392251AC2F7654698ED0 3], [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/1267554 4], [http://bookfi.net/md5/FC981853F7D4392251AC2F7654698ED0 5]|-|[[Jacques lacan|Jacques Lacan]]|[http://gen. lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=C4C1C8076674F191942740191C6DE894 La cosa freudiana e altri scritti]|<small>Einaudi</small>|<small>1972</small>|<small>252</small>|<small>Italian</small>|<small>8 Mb</small>|<big>pdf</big>|[http://library1.org/_ads/C4C1C8076674F191942740191C6DE894 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=C4C1C8076674F191942740191C6DE894 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/C4C1C8076674F191942740191C6DE894 3], [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/926138 4], [http://bookfi.net/md5/C4C1C8076674F191942740191C6DE894 5]|-|[[Jacques Lacan]]|''Das Seminar von [[Jacques lacan|Jacques Lacan]] Buch 1 (1953-1954)''''Freuds technische Schriften''''<small>9783530502138, 3530502138</small>''|<small>Walter</small>|<small>1978</small>|<small>364</small><small>[363]</small>|'''German'''|<small>9 Mb</small>|<big>pdf</big>|[http://library1.org/_ads/F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 3], [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/2208994 4], [http://bookfi.net/md5/F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 5]|}
The focal point of the discussion is the direction of the [[cure]]==French=={| class="floatright" style="float:right;margin-left:10px"| {| class="wikitable" width="210px" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff" style="float:right; margin-left: 10px;margin-right:0px;line-height:2. 0em; padding-left:60px; background:#ffffff; text-align:center;"|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" width="150px" style="padding-left:10px;" align="center" | Date| bgcolor="#ffffff" width="30px" style="padding-left:10px;" | PDF|-Through the case histories of Freud, Klein, Kris and Balint, the debate elucidates on the convergence of | bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:0px;" align="center" |18 novembre 1953| [[psychoanalysishttps://mega.nz/#!DX52mS6I!DKvdAH3cHEOpZ8z11aEejmnl-YgrbFvkPmhBdi8Glbc pdf]], |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 13 janvier 1954| [[philosophyhttps://mega.nz/#!HT4yxSAL!wBVLodWiwP2jIfz2mkNIVWQIfT3BZ3EqyRoVri05BLU pdf]], |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 20 janvier 1954| [[theologyhttps://mega.nz/#!jW40FAbB!RxGknYryXSKJPsF1C_YfWKeuXqfBnOfkVKyO6Yv3hnk pdf]], |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 27 janvier 1954| [[linguisticshttps://mega.nz/#!GCp0WazS!hnPzqdW-Srgye4utQ6NAFID4pjQW5rSnRj090q7Q18Y pdf]] and |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 3 février 1954| [[game theoryhttps://mega.nz/#!zbxmha6a!UXWk7cRnMx5ok13sq2w-1kzXQJ0WHFpzQY0CeejH17U pdf]]. |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 10 février 1954In keeping with this heterogeneous approach, Lacan will further appeal to the | [[sciencehttps://mega.nz/#!nTpQkAJY!HeAx1sOuKqRH-KYwnAWK8fG9Pvh_feob9AC3TgTe1ZU pdf]] of |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 17 février 1954| [[opticshttps://mega.nz/#!jKwgwIBB!QoxsGYuOToxRSQXDa6ktgDaBhSUxzC3uBbCmt7AjNvQ pdf]] to systematize his analyses of the specular relation. |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 24 février 1954 After his schema of the ''inverted bouquet'' the | [[mirror stagehttps://mega.nz/#!nCxi1Q7K!9rs9uaDqlIq2LwmilYtxuuHA4YGB0AM62H1viDbO_Ww pdf]] becomes part of the topography of the |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 10 mars 1954| [[Imaginaryhttps://mega.nz/#!fHxQiSxZ!jCbQKaIpITfEJjB13Ep-9KIwSsjW4ccp1kpZdRLMm9Y pdf]]. |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 17 mars 1954As to the ''| [[méconnaissancehttps://mega.nz/#!HLpUHKhC!kHDDgwC-TzSIznWGiLIpmi1uIdxoh8vr6BcPfjHhH7E pdf]]'' that characterizes the |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 24 mars 1954| [[egohttps://mega.nz/#!uLoU3C7a!GHXZuwDDRCsmGOBvczmpX-Wj3u3pcZNgPH7zDYdiuuA pdf]], it is associated with ''|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 31 mars 1954| [[Verneinunghttps://mega.nz/#!2LxUBI7D!ceYLvhdVLTu-bKukMBLQElxow6ClRoxkIJjtS74NQd0 pdf]]'' (''dénégation'')|}|{| class="wikitable" width="210px" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff" style="float:right; margin-left: 10px;line-height: "...everyday speech runs against failure of recognition, ''méconnaissance'', which is the source of ''Verneinung''2.0em; padding-left:60px; background:#ffffff; text-align:center;" | bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 7 avril 1954He closes the seminar pondering on the role of the | [[analyst]https://mega.nz/#!LSxWkYoI!9449kB_rFnMo375EO4hgviw5DbyVmQU1F45va1vq-sc pdf]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left: 15px;"| 5 mai 1954| [https://mega...if the [[subjectnz/#!eWxyAKBQ!k5A2JNv7FaOmp59CoUhe7VOFJ7GQ_oavUSZiZ8uM35Y pdf]] commits himself to searching after |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 12 mai 1954| [[truthhttps://mega.nz/#!jfokDQqB!CFxajL1BHcJZRC_6dbWYjIYY5zHzijWSkhWKNrmpUxE pdf]] as such, it is because he places himself in the dimension of ignorance, what analysts call readiness to the |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 19 mai 1954| [[transferencehttps://mega.nz/#!Pe50TaKI!gESYfwAbRijOxgHQ5_GUM5OXBmK215areo9vpBY-hQU pdf]]. |-The analyst's ignorance is also worth of consideration. He doesn't have to guide the subject to knowledge, but on to the paths by which access to this knowledge is gained. Psychoanalysis is a dialectics, an art of conversation.| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;"| 26 mai 1954| [https://mega.nz/#!LSgEUYxR!N6Bj2jANwGLjIywSnl95UeM051b-MsDcnn5bRHcUi_I pdf]In a spoken intervention (Appendix), Jean Hyppolite comments on Freud's ‘’Verneinung’’ and suggests its translation as ‘’dénégation’’ instead of ‘’négation’’. |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 2 juin 1954The question here deals with how | [[the return of the repressedhttps://mega.nz/#!KewyiYJJ!HF2UmexK6mh9ZdqB975fykjEBXubTTNolApGJW6E8rA pdf]] operates. |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 9 juin 1954According to Freud the repressed is intellectually accepted by the subject, since it is named, and at the same time is negated because the subject refuses to recognize it as his, refuses to recognize him in it| [https://mega. nz/#!Xa4UkajK!5Gi3YxdVEIzV7_p41LiwllJ8j6WFMY7_hjp1w1NMk_E pdf]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 16 juin 1954‘’Dénégation’’ includes an assertion whose status is difficult to define| [https://mega. nz/#!nX5ASCJb!q6Vzn5RAm0HVQW2r7I8hghIv17zN9wGFMeCrAg16R8U pdf]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 23 juin 1954The frontier between | [[neurosishttps://mega.nz/#!7ChE1QQZ!GfT5BIjPCH6rHe_-oIPZiP9tfFdrtBAWRUlZ-M-hehk pdf]] and |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 30 juin 1954| [[psychosishttps://mega.nz/#!zewgBC7Q!UQfiri4WmZ26KNX-T_jEHH5ZFSQxlfvHyGkoYi79P-o pdf]] is drawn here, between [[repression]], ‘’Verdrägung’’, and repudiation, ‘’Verwerfung’’, a term that Lacan will replace by withdrawal, and finally by |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;"| 7 juillet 1954| [[foreclosurehttps://mega.nz/#!HCoEQIDS!wgRupsvSH1uZjMHCWckhc8ysiwKRjkYwEA8DQihnhwg pdf]]" (‘’forclusion’’), the former being related to neurosis, the latter to psychosis.|}|}When answering Hyppolite in ‘’La Psychanalyse’’ that same year, Lacan establishes two poles French versions of analytic experience: the [[imaginaryJacques Lacan|Lacan's]] [[ego]] and the [[symbolic]] [[speechSeminars]]Source: http://ecole-lacanienne. net Lacan gives precedence to the Symbolic over the Imaginary. The * [[subjectFile:Seminaire_01.pdf|Download]] who must come to be is <BR><pdf width="[[the subject of the unconscious]]450px" and height="[[the unconscious is the discourse of the Other]].600px" In analysis, he says, "the subject first talks about himself without talking to you, then he talks to you without talking about himself>File:Seminaire_01. When he is able to talk to you about himself, the analysis is over." To this reshaping of the Imaginary by the Symbolic, he opposes the intersection of the Symbolic and the Real without mediation of the Imaginary, which would be the characteristic of psychosis.pdf</pdf>[[Category:WorksSeminars]]
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
[[Category:Sigmund Freud]]
[[Category:Seminars]]
__NOTOC__ __NOEDITSECTION__ __NOAUTOLINKS__
