Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Seminar I

8,921 bytes added, 12:33, 2 March 2021
Fixed some translation/grammar errors and hyperlink errors
[[Image:Sem1.jpg{{SeminarsNavBar|thumbRightPrevLink=|rightRightPrevText=|'''Le séminaire, Livre I: Les écrits techniques de Freud''']]RightNextLink=Seminar II|RightNextText=Seminar II|RightMainLink=Seminar XIV|RightMainText=Seminar XIV}}
{| align="center" style="width:600px; border:1px solid #aaa;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;"|-| style="width:150px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" | [[{{Y}}|1953 - 1954]]| style="width:150px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" |Seminar I| style="width:300px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" | ''Le Séminaire, Livre [[Seminar I: |Les écrits techniques de Freud]]''. Paris: Editions du Seuil, 1973. English version: ''The [[Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book I: |<big>Freud's Papers on Technique, 1953-1954''. Ed. J.-A. Miller. Trans. J. Forrester. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.</big>]]|}
[[Image:Sem.I.jpg|border|300px|right]]
{{SeminarBox
|title = Seminar I
|image = Seminar_I_Freud%27s_Papers_on_Technique.jpg
|Years = 1953 - 1954
|French = Les écrits techniques de Freud
|English = Freud's Papers on Technique
|Download =
|Mirror =
}}
<span style="line-height:2.0em;font-size:1.1em">The first [[seminar]], open to the public, takes place at Sainte-Anne Hospital just after the creation of the [[Société Française de Psychanalyse]] (S.F.P.). [[Lacan]] intervenes in the study of [[Freud]] by deploying his concepts of the three 'registers' of subjective experience: the [[imaginary]], the [[symbolic]] and the [[real]]. The focal point of the discussion is the direction of the [[cure]]. Participants are allowed to make presentations, comments and objections. Through the [[case]] histories of [[Freud]], [[Klein]], [[Kris]] and [[Balint]], the debate elucidates on the convergence of [[psychoanalysis]], [[philosophy]], [[theology]], [[linguistics]] and [[game theory]]. In keeping with this heterogeneous approach, [[Lacan]] will further appeal to the [[science]] of [[optics]] to systematize his analyses of the [[specular relation]]. After his [[schema]] of the [[inverted bouquet]] the [[mirror stage]] becomes part of the topography of the [[Imaginary]]. As to the ''[[méconnaissance]]'' that characterizes the [[ego]], it is associated with ''[[Negation|Verneinung]]'' (''dénégation''): "...everyday [[speech]] runs against failure of [[recognition]], ''[[méconnaissance]]'', which is the source of ''[[Verneinung]]''." He closes the [[seminar]] pondering on the [[role]] of the [[analyst]]: ''"...if [[The Subject|the subject]] commits himself to searching after [[truth]] as such, it is because he places himself in the [[dimension]] of [[ignorance]], what [[analyst]]s call readiness to the [[transference]]. The [[analyst]]'s ignorance is also worthy of consideration. He doesn't have to [[guide]] the [[subject]] to [[knowledge]], but onto the paths by which access to this [[knowledge]] is gained. [[Psychoanalysis]] is a [[dialectic]]s, an [[art]] of conversation."''</span>
<span style==Review==This seminar is perhaps the least interesting to students of the humanities "line-height:2.0em;font-size:1.1em">In a spoken [[intervention]] (Appendix), [[Jean Hyppolite]] comments on [[Freud]]'s ''[[Negation|Verneinung]]'' and social sciences, suggests its [[translation]] as it concerns questions ''dénégation'' instead of psychoanalytic technique''négation''. Freud's papers on technique were left out The question here deals with how the [[return of the Penguin repressed]] operates. According to [[Freud Library]], the [[repress]]ed is intellectually accepted by the [[subject]], since it is named, and at the same [[time]] is negated because the [[subject]] refuses to recognize it as they are explicitly addressed his, refuses to analystsrecognize himself in it. Lacan's seminar looks at questions of resistance 'Dénégation'' includes an assertion whose status is difficult to define. The frontier between [[neurosis]] and defence mechanisms[[psychosis]] is drawn here, between [[repression ]], ''Verdrägung'', and desire[[repudiation]], as well as transference. ''Book IVerwerfung'', a term that [[Lacan]] will replace with 'withdrawal', and finally with "[[foreclosure]]" (''forclusion'' also contains his early formulation of ), the imaginary and his critique of former being related to [[neurosis]], the Object Relations School of psychoanalysislatter to [[psychosis]].</span>
<span style==More=="line-height:2.0em;font-size:1.1em">When answering Hyppolite in La [[Psychanalyse]] that same year, [[Lacan]] establishes two poles of [[analytic experience]]: the [[imaginary]] [[ego]] and the [[symbolic]] [[speech]]. [[Lacan]] gives precedence to the [[Symbolic]] over the [[Imaginary]]. The subject who must come to be is "the [[subject of the unconscious]]," where here it is to be understood that "the [[unconscious is the discourse of the Other]]." In [[analysis]], he says, "the subject first talks about himself without talking to you, then he talks to you without talking about himself. When he is able to talk to you about himself, the analysis is over."</span>
'''Le séminaire, Livre I<span style="line-height: Les écrits techniques de Freud''' (19532.0em;font-1954)size:1.1em">To this reshaping of the [[Imaginary]] by the [[Symbolic]], he opposes the intersection of the [[Symbolic]] and the [[Real]] without mediation of the [[Imaginary]], which would be the characteristic of [[psychosis]].</span>
== Downloads =={| class="wikitable sortable" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="width:100%;"![[Author]](s)!Title!Publisher!Year!Pages![[Language]]!Size!Filetype!Downloads|-|[[Jacques Lacan]]|[[The first seminarSeminar of Jacques Lacan: Freud's Papers on Technique (Seminar I)]]<small>9780393306972</small>| class="s4" |W. W. Norton & Company|<small>1991</small>|<small>312</small>|<small>[[English]]</small>|<small>4 Mb</small>|<big>djvu</big>|[http://library1.org/_ads/5B4D56FA644161D57238A9E4732F4F1D 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=5B4D56FA644161D57238A9E4732F4F1D 2], open to the public[http://b-ok.cc/md5/5B4D56FA644161D57238A9E4732F4F1D 3], takes place at [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/436617 4], [Saintehttp://bookfi.net/md5/5B4D56FA644161D57238A9E4732F4F1D 5]|-Anne Hospital|[[Jacques Lacan|Jacques Lacan]] just after the creation |[[The Seminar of the Jacques Lacan: Freud's Papers on Technique (Seminar I)]]|W. W. Norton & Company|<small>1991</small>|<small>312</small>|<small>English</small>|<small>23 Mb</small>|<big>pdf</big>|[http://library1.org/_ads/C1ECD480977DAAE3E35B5B261B4DD3B8 1], [Shttps://ulozto.Fnet/file/9UYPScorSNa0/jacques-lacan-seminar-i-lacan-seminar-1-technique-pdf 2], [http://b-ok.Pcc/md5/C1ECD480977DAAE3E35B5B261B4DD3B8 3], [http://bookfi.net/md5/C1ECD480977DAAE3E35B5B261B4DD3B8 4]|-|[[Jacques Lacan|Jacques Lacan]] |''Das Seminar von [[Jacques lacan|Jacques Lacan]] Buch 1 (Société Française de Psychanalyse1953-1954)''Freuds technische Schriften''<small>9783530502138, 3530502138</small>''|<small>Walter</small>|<small>1978</small>|<small>364</small><small>[363]</small>|<small>[[German]]</small>|<small>9 Mb</small>|<big>pdf</big>|[http://library1.org/_ads/F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 3], [http://libgen. me/item/detail/id/2208994 4], [http://bookfi.net/md5/F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 5]|}
=== Related ==={| class="wikitable sortable" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="width:100%;"|Richard Feldstein, [[LacanBruce Fink]] cuts , Maire Jaanus|''<sup>SUNY Series in the study Psychoanalysis & [[Culture]]</sup>''[[Reading]] [[Seminars]] I and II: Lacan’s [[Return to Freud]]|[[State]] [[University]] of New York Press|1996|460[445]|English|3 Mb|pdf|[http://library1.org/_ads/7B5AA1FD77827BE2863C11DDBF71A1F3 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=7B5AA1FD77827BE2863C11DDBF71A1F3 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/7B5AA1FD77827BE2863C11DDBF71A1F3 3], [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/2113769 4], [http://bookfi.net/md5/7B5AA1FD77827BE2863C11DDBF71A1F3 5]|-|Richard Feldstein, Bruce Fink, Maire Jaanus|''<small>SUNY Series in Psychoanalysis & Culture</small>''Reading Seminars I and II: Lacan’s [[Return to freud|Return to Freud]] by dint |State University of his theory on the New York Press|1996|445|English|7 Mb|pdf|[http://library1.org/_ads/3CBBB510FD49D6C8591E58329A8FBC8F 1], [imaginaryhttp://libgen.io/get.php?md5=3CBBB510FD49D6C8591E58329A8FBC8F 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/3CBBB510FD49D6C8591E58329A8FBC8F 3], the [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/2245094 4], [symbolichttp://bookfi.net/md5/3CBBB510FD49D6C8591E58329A8FBC8F 5]|-|Richard [[Boothby] ]|Death and the Desire: Psychoanalytic Theory in Lacan's Return to Freud <small>[1 ed.]</small>|<small>Routledge</small>|<small>1991</small>|<small>276</small>|<small>English</small>|<small>4 Mb</small>|<big>djvu</big>|[realhttp://library1.org/_ads/FC981853F7D4392251AC2F7654698ED0 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=FC981853F7D4392251AC2F7654698ED0 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/FC981853F7D4392251AC2F7654698ED0 3], [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/1267554 4], [http://bookfi.net/md5/FC981853F7D4392251AC2F7654698ED0 5]|-|[[Jacques lacan|Jacques Lacan]]|[http://gen. lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=C4C1C8076674F191942740191C6DE894 La cosa freudiana e altri scritti]|<small>Einaudi</small>|<small>1972</small>|<small>252</small>|<small>Italian</small>|<small>8 Mb</small>|<big>pdf</big>|[http://library1.org/_ads/C4C1C8076674F191942740191C6DE894 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=C4C1C8076674F191942740191C6DE894 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/C4C1C8076674F191942740191C6DE894 3], [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/926138 4], [http://bookfi.net/md5/C4C1C8076674F191942740191C6DE894 5]|-|[[Jacques Lacan]]|''Das Seminar von [[Jacques lacan|Jacques Lacan]] Buch 1 (1953-1954)''''Freuds technische Schriften''''<small>9783530502138, 3530502138</small>''|<small>Walter</small>|<small>1978</small>|<small>364</small><small>[363]</small>|'''German'''|<small>9 Mb</small>|<big>pdf</big>|[http://library1.org/_ads/F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 1], [http://libgen.io/get.php?md5=F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 2], [http://b-ok.cc/md5/F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 3], [http://libgen.me/item/detail/id/2208994 4], [http://bookfi.net/md5/F512F7385F1A2EDB38EF6498CCAF2FDD 5]|}
The focal point of the discussion is the direction of the [[cure]]==French=={| class="floatright" style="float:right;margin-left:10px"| {| class="wikitable" width="210px" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff" style="float:right; margin-left: 10px;margin-right:0px;line-height:2. 0em; padding-left:60px; background:#ffffff; text-align:center;"|-Participants are allowed to make presentations, comments and objections. | bgcolor="#ffffff" width="150px" style="padding-left:10px;" align="center" | Date| bgcolor="#ffffff" width="30px" style="padding-left:10px;" | PDF|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:0px;" align="center" |18 novembre 1953Through the case histories of Freud, Klein, Kris and Balint, the debate elucidates on the convergence of | [[psychoanalysishttps://mega.nz/#!DX52mS6I!DKvdAH3cHEOpZ8z11aEejmnl-YgrbFvkPmhBdi8Glbc pdf]], |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 13 janvier 1954| [[philosophyhttps://mega.nz/#!HT4yxSAL!wBVLodWiwP2jIfz2mkNIVWQIfT3BZ3EqyRoVri05BLU pdf]], |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 20 janvier 1954| [[theologyhttps://mega.nz/#!jW40FAbB!RxGknYryXSKJPsF1C_YfWKeuXqfBnOfkVKyO6Yv3hnk pdf]], |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 27 janvier 1954| [[linguisticshttps://mega.nz/#!GCp0WazS!hnPzqdW-Srgye4utQ6NAFID4pjQW5rSnRj090q7Q18Y pdf]] and |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 3 février 1954| [[game theoryhttps://mega.nz/#!zbxmha6a!UXWk7cRnMx5ok13sq2w-1kzXQJ0WHFpzQY0CeejH17U pdf]]. |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 10 février 1954In keeping with this heterogeneous approach, Lacan will further appeal to the | [[sciencehttps://mega.nz/#!nTpQkAJY!HeAx1sOuKqRH-KYwnAWK8fG9Pvh_feob9AC3TgTe1ZU pdf]] of |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 17 février 1954| [[opticshttps://mega.nz/#!jKwgwIBB!QoxsGYuOToxRSQXDa6ktgDaBhSUxzC3uBbCmt7AjNvQ pdf]] to systematize his analyses of the specular relation. |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 24 février 1954 After his | [[schemahttps://mega.nz/#!nCxi1Q7K!9rs9uaDqlIq2LwmilYtxuuHA4YGB0AM62H1viDbO_Ww pdf]] of the |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 10 mars 1954| [[inverted bouquethttps://mega.nz/#!fHxQiSxZ!jCbQKaIpITfEJjB13Ep-9KIwSsjW4ccp1kpZdRLMm9Y pdf]] the |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 17 mars 1954| [[mirror stagehttps://mega.nz/#!HLpUHKhC!kHDDgwC-TzSIznWGiLIpmi1uIdxoh8vr6BcPfjHhH7E pdf]] becomes part of the |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 24 mars 1954| [[topographyhttps://mega.nz/#!uLoU3C7a!GHXZuwDDRCsmGOBvczmpX-Wj3u3pcZNgPH7zDYdiuuA pdf]] of the |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 31 mars 1954| [[Imaginaryhttps://mega.nz/#!2LxUBI7D!ceYLvhdVLTu-bKukMBLQElxow6ClRoxkIJjtS74NQd0 pdf]]. |}|As to the ‘’[[méconnaissance]]’’ that characterizes the [[ego]], it is associated with ‘’[[Verneinung]]’’ (‘’dénégation’’){| class="wikitable" width="210px" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" align="center" bgcolor="#ffffff" style="float:right; margin-left: 10px;line-height: "...everyday speech runs against failure of recognition, ‘’méconnaissance’’, which is the source of ‘’Verneinung’’2.0em; padding-left:60px; background:#ffffff; text-align:center;" | bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 7 avril 1954He closes the seminar pondering on the role of the | [[analyst]https://mega.nz/#!LSxWkYoI!9449kB_rFnMo375EO4hgviw5DbyVmQU1F45va1vq-sc pdf]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left: 15px;"| 5 mai 1954| [https://mega...if the [[subjectnz/#!eWxyAKBQ!k5A2JNv7FaOmp59CoUhe7VOFJ7GQ_oavUSZiZ8uM35Y pdf]] commits himself to searching after |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 12 mai 1954| [[truthhttps://mega.nz/#!jfokDQqB!CFxajL1BHcJZRC_6dbWYjIYY5zHzijWSkhWKNrmpUxE pdf]] as such, it is because he places himself in the dimension of ignorance, what analysts call readiness to the |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 19 mai 1954| [[transferencehttps://mega.nz/#!Pe50TaKI!gESYfwAbRijOxgHQ5_GUM5OXBmK215areo9vpBY-hQU pdf]]. The analyst's ignorance is also worth of consideration. He doesn't have to guide the subject to knowledge, but on to the paths by which access to this knowledge is gained. Psychoanalysis is a dialectics, an art of conversation."|-In a spoken intervention (Appendix), Jean Hyppolite comments on Freud's ‘’Verneinung’’ and suggests its translation as ‘’dénégation’’ instead of ‘’négation’’. | bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 26 mai 1954 The question here deals with how | [[the return of the repressedhttps://mega.nz/#!LSgEUYxR!N6Bj2jANwGLjIywSnl95UeM051b-MsDcnn5bRHcUi_I pdf]] operates. |-According to Freud the repressed is intellectually accepted by the subject, since it is named, and at the same time is negated because the subject refuses to recognize it as his, refuses to recognize him in it. | bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 2 juin 1954 ‘’Dénégation’’ includes an assertion whose status is difficult to define| [https://mega. nz/#!KewyiYJJ!HF2UmexK6mh9ZdqB975fykjEBXubTTNolApGJW6E8rA pdf]|-The frontier between [[neurosis]] and [[psychosis]] is drawn here, between [[repression]], ‘’Verdrägung’’, and repudiation, ‘’Verwerfung’’, a term that Lacan will replace by withdrawal, and finally by | bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;"| 9 juin 1954| [[foreclosure]https://mega.nz/#!Xa4UkajK!5Gi3YxdVEIzV7_p41LiwllJ8j6WFMY7_hjp1w1NMk_E pdf]" (‘’forclusion’’), the former being related to neurosis, the latter to psychosis.|-When answering Hyppolite in ‘’La Psychanalyse’’ that same year, Lacan establishes two poles of analytic experience| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left: the 15px;" | 16 juin 1954| [[imaginaryhttps://mega.nz/#!nX5ASCJb!q6Vzn5RAm0HVQW2r7I8hghIv17zN9wGFMeCrAg16R8U pdf]] [[ego]] and the [[symbolic]] [[speech]]. |-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px;" | 23 juin 1954Lacan gives precedence to the Symbolic over the Imaginary| [https://mega. nz/#!7ChE1QQZ!GfT5BIjPCH6rHe_-oIPZiP9tfFdrtBAWRUlZ-M-hehk pdf]|-The [[subject]] who must come to be is | bgcolor="#ffffff"[[the subject of the unconscious]]style=" and padding-left:15px;"| 30 juin 1954| [[the unconscious is the discourse of the Otherhttps://mega.nz/#!zewgBC7Q!UQfiri4WmZ26KNX-T_jEHH5ZFSQxlfvHyGkoYi79P-o pdf]]." |-In analysis, he says, | bgcolor="#ffffff" style="the subject first talks about himself without talking to you, then he talks to you without talking about himself. When he is able to talk to you about himself, the analysis is over.padding-left:15px;"| 7 juillet 1954 To this reshaping of the Imaginary by the Symbolic, he opposes the intersection of the Symbolic and the Real without mediation of the Imaginary, which would be the characteristic of psychosis| [https://mega.nz/#!HCoEQIDS!wgRupsvSH1uZjMHCWckhc8ysiwKRjkYwEA8DQihnhwg pdf]|}==See Also==|}French versions of [[Jacques Lacan|Lacan's Metaphor of the Mirror Stage]]. {From Volume 1 of the Seminar[[Seminars]] Source: Freud's Papers on Technique) <http://personalecole-lacanienne.bgsunet* [[File:Seminaire_01.edu/~dcallen/mirror.htmlpdf|Download]]<BR<pdf width="450px" height= References ==French"600px">File: (texte établi par Jacques-Alain Miller), Paris: Seuil, 1975Seminaire_01.English: ‘’’Book I: Freud's Papers on Technique’’’ (edited by Jacques-Alain Miller), New York: Norton, 1988.pdf</pdf>[[Category:WorksSeminars]]
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
[[Category:Sigmund Freud]]
== See also ==‘’[[méconnaissance]]’’__NOTOC__ __NOAUTOLINKS__

Navigation menu