Changes

{{SSeminarsNavBar|RightPrevLink=Seminar XV|RightPrevText=Seminar XV|RightNextLink=Seminar XVII|RightNextText=Seminar XVII}}[[Image:Sem16.jpg|250px|thumb|right]]{| classalign="wikitablecenter" style="width:450px600px; border:1px solid #aaa;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;"!width="100px"|!width="300px"|

! | style="width:100px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" | 1968 - 1969| style="width:100px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" | [[Seminar XVI]]| style="width:300px;text-align:left; line-height:2.0em; padding-left:10px;" | ''Le séminaire, Livre [[Seminar XVI: |D'un Autre à l'autre]]''<BR>The <big>[[Seminar, Book XVI: |From One an Other to the Other]]</big>

Lacan takes a stand in the crisis of the university that follows May 1968[[Image: "If psychoanalysis cannot be articulated as a knowledge and taught as such, it has no place in Academia, where it is only a matter of knowledgeSem16." He rejects nonconceptualization: structure is the real. Dealing with the passage from objet a to the Other and from the Other to objet a, Lacan analyzes and combines Pascal, Marx and the logic of the link between l, the unbroken line, the trait unitaire of L'identification and a as follows:jpg|border|350px|right]]

To [[Lacan]] takes a stand in the crisis of the [[university]] thatfollows [[May 1968]]: "If [[psychoanalysis]] cannot be articulated as a [[knowledge]] and taught as such, he adds questions on feminine jouissance (is it the has no [[place ]] in Academia, where it is only a matter of knowledge." He rejects nonconceptualization: [[structure]] is the [[real]]. Dealing with the passage from <i>[[objet]] a</i> to the [[Other or of ]] and from the Thing?)Other to <i>[[objet a]]</i>, Lacan analyzes and combines [[Pascal]], on [[Marx]] and the nullibiquité, non-ubiquitousness, [[logic]] of the phallus that testifies that jouissance is real but cannot be symbolizedlink between l, on the Phallus as a symbol that is lacking or outside systemunbroken line, and the repetition <i>[[trait]] unitaire</i> of the Graphs of Desire.<i>L'[[identification]]</i> and <i>a</i> as follows:<br>

Marx invented surplus-value, plus-value, and he, Lacan, invented the objet a. He asserts that he is going to construct the plus-de-jouir so as to isolate the objet a, he will do so by homology with surplus-value. In the matheme of fantasy, <>a, "the being of a is the plus-de-jouir, surplus-jouissance.* At the level of the enunciation, perversion reveals "surplus-jouissance in its bare form." The rapport between surplus-jouissance and surplus-value is the function of the objet a. The perverse has given to God his true plenitude by giving a back to the Other. Hence, a is in A (the small other is in the big Other); however, a makes a hole in A. Jouissance is excluded, the Other is the place where it is known, a is the effect of fall that results from it. So, after going from a to A, one must go from A to a[[Image:lacansem1c1.gif|center]]

"I mainly talk [[about ]] a [[dead ]] God, maybe in [[order ]] to better free myself from my relation to a dead [[Freud]]." Yet, in <i>Le Pari</i>, Pascal raises the question of the [[existence ]] of God. The only true question is that of the [[subject]]: Does I [[exist]]? Do I exist? "The [[nothing ]] that [[life ]] is," which is at stake for Pascal, is the surplus-<i>jouissance</i>. The assumption of the [[loss ]] creates the gap, <i>béance</i>, between the [[body ]] and its <i>jouissance</i>: such is the effect of the <i>objet a</i>, the lost [[object]], in the field of the Other. For Pascal, the central point is "the infinite nothing"; the only salvation is grace, for God's mercy is bigger than His justice. Grace allows proximity to the desire of the Other in its various forms: "I ask myself what you [[want]]," then "I ask you what you want," which leads to "Thy Will be Done!" However, this [[sentence ]] is uttered to a faceless Other. God's will, for not being our will, comes to [[lack]]; then, for lack of God, we are left with the [[Father ]] as dead, the Father as a [[name ]] (the pivot of [[discourse]]) and as the rapport of <i>jouissance </i> to [[castration]]. "The [[Name-of-the-Father ]] is a rift that remains wide open in my discourse, it is only known through an act of [[faith]]: there is no Incarnation in the place of the Other."<br>Slavoj [[Zizek]] aptly describes surplus-<i>jouissance</i> (<i>[[lacanian]] ink</i> 15) as follows:<br>

Slavoj Zizek aptly describes "So in the [[case]] of the caffeine-free diet Coke, we drink the Nothingness itself, the pure [[semblance]] of a property that is effectively merely an envelope of a [[void]]. This example makes palpable the inherent link between [[three]] notions: that of the [[Marxist]] surplus-value, that of the Lacanian <i>objet a</i> as surplus-<i>jouissance </i>, and the [[paradox]] of the [[superego]], perceived long ago by Freud: the more you drink Coke, the more you are thirsty; the more profit you have , the more you want; the more you obey the supergo command, the more you are [[guilty]]. In all three cases, the logic of balanced [[exchange]] is perturbed in favor of an excessive logic of "the more you give, the more you owe (lacanian ink 15or the consumerist version "the more you buy, the more you have to spend") , of the paradox which is the very opposite of the paradox of [[love]] where, as followsJuliet put in her immortal [[words]] to Romeo, 'the more I give, the more I have'.<br>The key to this perturbation is the surplus-<i>jouissance</i>, the <i>objet a</i> which [[exists]] (or rather insists) in a kind of curved [[space]] in which, the more you approach it, the more it eludes your grasp (or, the more you possess it, the greater the lack).<br>Perhaps, [[sexual]] [[difference]] enters here in an unexpected way:the [[reason]] why the supergo is stronger in man is that it is man, not [[woman]], who is intensely related to this [[excess]] of the surplus-<i>jouissance</i> over the pacifying functionning of the [[symbolic]] Law. In [[terms]] of the [[paternal function]], the opposition between the pacifying symbolic Law and the excessive supergo [[injunction]] is the one between the Name-of-the-Father (the paternal symbolic [[authority]]) and the "primordial father," allowed to [[enjoy]] all [[women]]. This rapist "primordial father" is a [[male]] ([[obsessional]]), not feminine ([[Imagehysterical]]), fantasy:lacansem1c1it is man who is able to endure his integration into [[the symbolic]] order only when this integration is sustained by some hidden reference to the fantasy of the unbridled excessive <i>jouissance</i> embodied in the unconditional supergo injunction to enjoy, <i>jouir</i> to go to the extreme, to trangress and force constantly the [[limit]].gifIt is man in whom the integration into the [[symbolic order]]is sustained by the superego exception."<br>

"So in [[Bruce Fink]] [[notes]] that the case [[translation]] of the caffeine<i>plus-de-free diet Cokejouir</i> rendered in <i>[[Television]]</i> (New York: Norton, we drink the Nothingness itself, the pure semblance of a property that 1989) as "over-coming" is effectively merely an envelope of a voiddeficient. This example makes palpable the inherent link between three notions: that of the Marxist Since <i>plus-de-jouir</i> is based on <i>plus-value</i> (Marx's [[surplus-value]]), that of the Lacanian objet it means a as surplus-, extra or supplemental <i>jouissance, and the paradox of the superego, perceived long ago by Freud</i>: the more you drink Coke, <i>plus</i> should be [[understood]] in the more you are thirsty; the more profit you have [[sense]] of <i>[[Encore]]</i>, the more you want; the more you obey the supergo command, the more you are guiltyMore. In all three cases, the logic of balanced exchange is perturbed in favor of an excessive logic of He stresses that "the more you give, the more you owe (sensual sense of being 'overcome' with or the consumerist version "the more you buy, the more you have to spend"), of the paradox which 'overwhelmed' by [[pleasure]] is the very opposite of the paradox of love where, as Juliet put in her immortal words related to Romeo, 'the more I give, the more I have'Other <i>jouissance</i>.

  * ''Le séminaire, Livre XVI: D'un Autre à l'autre, 1968-1969''.==French=={| class="toccolourswikitable floatright" width="250px" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="4" align="center" bgcolor="ffffff" style="float: right; clearmargin-left: right10px; marginline-height: 0 0 02.5em 1em0em;"|+ style="fontpadding-sizeleft: larger30px; marginbackground:#ffffff; text-leftalign: 1emcenter;"||- bgcolor="#ffffff" width="200px" style="verticalpadding-alignleft: top;10px" height"30"| Date|stylebgcolor="background: #CCCCCC;ffffff" colspanwidth="350px" alignstyle=center"padding-left:10px" |'''Download''' PDF|- | bgcolor="#ffffff" style="verticalpadding-alignleft: top;15px"| 13 novembre 1968|* [httphttps://{{Archive}}mega.nz/seminaireXVI/1968.11.#!PXoXjQxC!0IqyKxc_AUIr-0GuUq4Tjc6k0mBdiQt6u9ziQrzP5iw link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 20.pdf novembre 1968.11.20.pdf] * | [httphttps://{{Archive}}mega.nz/seminaireXVI/1968.11.#!vX4xGK5S!vvrOStTem2XbmM9dyLlNxJ52qp8HTdyuv9Gepp-bpKA link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 27.pdf novembre 1968.11.27.pdf]* | [httphttps://{{Archive}}mega.nz/seminaireXVI/1968.12.#!7Hh3DCIB!txn0id0flBt8gxke-ZgfQgbo1TnwxCBR-E_KXwLADOE link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 04.pdf décembre 1968.12.04.pdf]* | [httphttps://{{Archive}}mega.nz/seminaireXVI/1968.12.#!mDxRlYQD!51nVX6q4VGIaZVtMeIDNYY8a4AyGpxXXNegwVRw-Uxs link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 11.pdf décembre 1968.12.11.pdf]* | [httphttps://{{Archive}}mega.nz/seminaireXVI/1969.01.#!vf4DSKpZ!ysBLm5qowFhlreogZ99ionvaNUbhEByfUXvLpDvNQ1g link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 08.pdf janvier 1969.01.08.pdf]* | [httphttps://{{Archive}}mega.nz/seminaireXVI/1969.01.#!GHxnWIzJ!TnSfDGtNqWdpfpyR8XLPuyqIJq2Y9mr8jVNE0b-52fk link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 15.pdf janvier 1969.01.15.pdf]* | [httphttps://{{Archive}}mega.nz/seminaireXVI/1969.01.#!6XwTRQxI!ojycDPH-Al91jPIwIr5Mj4v-nXlwJbyx30QJjbcXwrA link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 22.pdf janvier 1969.01.22.pdf]* | [httphttps://{{Archive}}mega.nz/seminaireXVI/1969.01.#!XLphxa5I!XJk-gxwiDJ64PrwThK1JVQReZ4nCUsF1lTgigONsKNc link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 29.pdf janvier 1969.01.29.pdf]* | [httphttps://{{Archive}}mega.nz/seminaireXVI/1969.02.#!nCxTCCLD!lDUEi9-M08gt1LS_To5UQg0NHvIXkieUsKZ1pr0iI6I link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 05.pdf février 1969.02.05.pdf]* | [httphttps://{{Archive}}mega.nz/seminaireXVI/1969.02.#!uWxTyIYK!YbLy0mMLtldYkPYc_g3aHDEenKJQRFACgnw1d4kv0Tw link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 12.pdf février 1969.02.12.pdf]* | [httphttps://{{Archive}}mega.nz/seminaireXVI/1969.02.#!LL5VhIjQ!ApDca5P5tPlCsVsxqRSV8A4ZhGFa3DhiahEWRLa5Xnw link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 26.pdf février 1969.02.26.pdf]* | [httphttps://{{Archive}}mega.nz/seminaireXVI/1969.03.#!2KwTGCqR!GWvGTg9sK7IQdEZjCEMjIBGFMiIDhdy-zArTKX8uB2w link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 05.pdf mars 1969.03.05.pdf]* | [httphttps://{{Archive}}mega.nz/seminaireXVI/1969.03.#!6axXCA6L!CJukr6127AXJdEKS2J5WeI3fdRcIpSFISPZ13sEQg_M link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 12.pdf mars 1969.03.12.pdf]* | [httphttps://{{Archive}}mega.nz/seminaireXVI/1969.03.#!jT51FQTK!C0nhbf4c1-jF0mVeh-NPXGqpsBB_oJQIVSBLQru_DEM link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 19.pdf mars 1969.03.19.pdf]* | [httphttps://{{Archive}}mega.nz/seminaireXVI/1969.03.#!GOo1xS7a!DxSAA_GRF5ZwltUjdn9mD4EEtFDZmrlZM_UCF_tQGag link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 26.pdf mars 1969.03.26.pdf] * | [httphttps://{{Archive}}mega.nz/seminaireXVI/1969.04.#!PT5zCIAb!CzD8qSzbZAkA8pHzg2rIGntT2QMrrnLwDDg4BNZf0Bo link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 23.pdf avril 1969.04.23.pdf]* | [httphttps://{{Archive}}mega.nz/seminaireXVI/1969.04.#!ib5lhIbD!j8LGxyjdD_-xDK7DKCheEy6GbpDNFYZkH5krcqZceUU link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 30.pdf avril 1969.04.30.pdf]* | [httphttps://{{Archive}}mega.nz/seminaireXVI/1969.05.#!XTgxgQoI!V-EAGo2NYwK_zWxuI1p5ktIkEB2rQcXeGhW6DYxRvOY link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 07.pdf mai 1969.05.07.pdf]* | [httphttps://{{Archive}}mega.nz/seminaireXVI/1969.05.#!6LgFgCgB!9o8jdWGdynHQrVNwa9sDyelvlWtwKShFtB89sjYfQeQ link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 14.pdf mai 1969.05.14.pdf]* | [httphttps://{{Archive}}mega.nz/seminaireXVI/1969.05.#!fWxlwKoL!XK03B02ofoDFCS5xz7orjTrJ7oX-D2CQ_OGQGdkw37c link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 21.pdf mai 1969.05.21.pdf]* | [httphttps://{{Archive}}mega.nz/seminaireXVI/1969.06.#!GKxh1A6B!qk2zkqIU5AxAEs88LgExRIwz0BRFkmQCZey0YYKshi8 link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 04.pdf juin 1969.06.04.pdf]* | [httphttps://{{Archive}}mega.nz/seminaireXVI/1969.06.#!KexXwQSJ!_WunblYMSalCOlCsMLpBnVBA0P4fHPmIa_AaNM7-oks link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 11.pdf juin 1969.06.11.pdf] * | [httphttps://{{Archive}}mega.nz/seminaireXVI/1969.06.#!TGpnACbL!7SWp7REykKWY_PD48CKiwGEHPsLWnPQV2vTURX59LeQ link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 18.pdf juin 1969.06.18.pdf]* | [httphttps://{{Archive}}mega.nz/seminaireXVI/1969.06.#!XDxh3CYZ!1ujGXZeql49L8kBL0pGS5A1afpd3NDeL_H9IO4RncXA link]|-| bgcolor="#ffffff" style="padding-left:15px" | 25.pdf juin 1969| [https://mega.06.25.pdfnz/#!nboRhQ7K!GO2yLQmUHemLzXXjpIH1pl2NbKr-YOkJILuZp7BEZ58 link]

<!-- [[1968]]-1969<b>Le séminaire, Livre XVI: D'un [[Autre]] à l'autre.</b><br>[[French]]: unpublished.<br>[[English]]: unpublished. -->[[Category:Seminars]]

[[Category:Works]] __NOTOC____NOAUTOLINKS__ __NOAUTOLINKS__