24,656
edits
Changes
no edit summary
Indeed, the experience of [[transference]] is precisely what undermines the notion of [[intersubjectivity]].<ref>Lacan. 1967</ref>
'''Intersubjectivity''' refers to the "common sense," shared [[meanings]] constructed by people in their interactions with each other and used as an everyday resource to [[interpret]] the [[meaning]] of elements of [[social]] and [[cultural]] [[life]].
The [[French]] [[philopsopher]] [[Jean-Paul Sartre]] argued that in making choices in life we effectively make choices for all [[human]]s as what is chosen is always the better choice, and what is better for one is better for all.
This is also called '[[intersubjectivity]]'.
For [[Lacan]], the [[analytic]] experience is a dialogue on the [[symbolic]] place of [[full]] [[speech]], an interaction between two [[subjective]] [[desire]]s.
The [[intersubjective]] relationship between the [[analysand]] and the [[analyst]].
[[Psychoanalytic]] [[treatment]] as a [[symbolic]] interaction between two [[subject]]s.
Referring again to [[Freud]]’s explanation of [[transference]] in [[The Interpretation of Dreams]] (1900), [[Lacan]] reported in the former text that "transference…gave its name to the mainspring of the intersubjective link between analyst and analysand."<ref>Lacan 1977g[1957]:170</ref>
<blockquote>I am astounded that no-one has ever thought of objecting to me, given certain of the terms of my doctrine, that the transference alone is an objection to intersubjectivity. I even regret it, seeing that nothing is more true: it refutes it, it is its stumbling block.<ref>Lacan 1995b[1967]:4</ref></blockquote>
----
'''Intersubjectivity''' refers to the "common sense," shared [[meanings]] constructed by people in their interactions with each other and used as an everyday resource to [[interpret]] the [[meaning]] of elements of [[social]] and [[cultural]] [[life]].
