Difference between revisions of "Words"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles">https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles</a>).)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
=Freudian Dictionary=
 
=Freudian Dictionary=
<blockquote>We do not, indeed, wish to decry words. They are a mighty instrument, the means by which we convey our feelings, the way by which we influence others. Words can do unutterable good, and appalling harm. No doubt, in the beginning was the deed-the word came later; in some contexts it was a cultural advance when deeds were moderated to words. But still, words were originally spells, acts of magic, and they still retain much of their old power.<ref>{{QLA}} Ch. 1</ref></blockquote>
+
<blockquote>We do not, indeed, [[wish]] to decry words. They are a mighty [[instrument]], the means by which we convey our [[feelings]], the way by which we influence [[others]]. Words can do unutterable [[good]], and appalling harm. No [[doubt]], in the beginning was the deed-the [[word]] came later; in some contexts it was a [[cultural]] advance when deeds were moderated to words. But still, words were originally spells, [[acts]] of [[magic]], and they still retain much of their old [[power]].<ref>{{QLA}} Ch. 1</ref></blockquote>
  
  

Latest revision as of 03:34, 21 May 2019

Freudian Dictionary

We do not, indeed, wish to decry words. They are a mighty instrument, the means by which we convey our feelings, the way by which we influence others. Words can do unutterable good, and appalling harm. No doubt, in the beginning was the deed-the word came later; in some contexts it was a cultural advance when deeds were moderated to words. But still, words were originally spells, acts of magic, and they still retain much of their old power.[1]

|