Difference between revisions of "Paternal metaphor"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | [[Image:Lacan-paternalmetaphor.jpg|center]] | |
+ | [[paternal metaphor]] ([[French]]: ''[[métaphore paternelle]]'') | ||
− | from Victor Hugo's poem, Booz endormi | + | ==Paternity and Metaphor== |
+ | When, in 1956, [[Lacan]] first begins to discuss the tropes of [[metaphor]] and [[metonymy]] in detail, the example he takes to illustrate the structure of [[metaphor]] is a line from [[Victor Hugo]]'s [[poem]], [[Booz endormi]].<ref>Hugo, 1859-83: 97-9</ref> | ||
− | retells the biblical story of Ruth and Boaz; while Ruth sleeps at his feet, | + | This [[poem]] retells the [[biblical]] story of Ruth and Boaz; while Ruth sleeps at his feet, Boaz dreams that a tree grows out of his stomach, a revelation that he is to be the founder of a race. |
− | Boaz | + | In the line which [[Lacan]] quotes - "His sheaf was neither miserly nor spiteful" - the [[metaphoric]] [[substitution]] of "sheaf" for "Boaz" produces a poetic effect of [[signification]].<ref>{{S3}} p.218-25; {{S4}} p.377-8; {{E}} p.156-8; {{S8}} p.158-9</ref> |
− | + | [[Paternity]] is thus both the theme of the [[poem]] (its [[content]]) and also inherent in the [[structure]] of [[metaphor]] itself. | |
− | + | All [[paternity]] involves [[metaphor]]ic [[substitution]], and vice versa. | |
− | ' | + | ==Paternal Metaphor== |
+ | The phrase '[[paternal metaphor]]' is introduced by [[Lacan]] in 1957.<ref>{{S4}} p.379</ref> | ||
− | + | In 1958, he goes on to elaborate the [[structure]] of this [[metaphor]]; it involves the [[substitution]] of one [[signifier]] (the [[Name-of-the-Father]]) for another (the [[desire]] of the [[mother]]).<ref>{{E}} p.200</ref> | |
− | + | The [[paternal metaphor]] thus designates the [[metaphorical]] (i.e. [[substitutive]]) character of the [[oedipus complex]] itself. | |
− | + | It is the fundamental [[metaphor]] on which all [[signification]] depends: for this reason, all [[signification]] is [[phallic]]. | |
− | + | If the [[Name-of-the-Father]] is [[foreclosed]] (i.e. in [[psychosis]]), there can be no [[paternal metaphor]], and hence no [[phallic]] [[signification]]. | |
− | + | ==See Also== | |
+ | * [[Metonymy]] | ||
+ | * [[Metaphor]] | ||
+ | * [[Symbolic]] | ||
+ | * [[Oedipus complex]] | ||
+ | * [[Signification]] | ||
+ | * [[Psychosis]] | ||
+ | * [[Name-of-the-Father]] | ||
+ | * [[Poetry]] | ||
− | + | ==References== | |
+ | <references/> | ||
− | + | [[Category:Theory]] | |
− | + | [[Category:Psychoanalytic theory]] | |
− | + | [[Category:Symbolic]] | |
− | + | [[Category:Terms]] | |
− | + | [[Category:Concepts]] | |
− | + | [[Category:Psychoanalysis]] | |
− | + | [[Category:Jacques Lacan]] | |
− | + | [[Category:Help]] | |
− | + | [[Category:New]] | |
− | + | [[Category:Dictionary]] | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
Revision as of 12:02, 26 June 2006
paternal metaphor (French: métaphore paternelle)
Paternity and Metaphor
When, in 1956, Lacan first begins to discuss the tropes of metaphor and metonymy in detail, the example he takes to illustrate the structure of metaphor is a line from Victor Hugo's poem, Booz endormi.[1]
This poem retells the biblical story of Ruth and Boaz; while Ruth sleeps at his feet, Boaz dreams that a tree grows out of his stomach, a revelation that he is to be the founder of a race.
In the line which Lacan quotes - "His sheaf was neither miserly nor spiteful" - the metaphoric substitution of "sheaf" for "Boaz" produces a poetic effect of signification.[2]
Paternity is thus both the theme of the poem (its content) and also inherent in the structure of metaphor itself.
All paternity involves metaphoric substitution, and vice versa.
Paternal Metaphor
The phrase 'paternal metaphor' is introduced by Lacan in 1957.[3]
In 1958, he goes on to elaborate the structure of this metaphor; it involves the substitution of one signifier (the Name-of-the-Father) for another (the desire of the mother).[4]
The paternal metaphor thus designates the metaphorical (i.e. substitutive) character of the oedipus complex itself.
It is the fundamental metaphor on which all signification depends: for this reason, all signification is phallic.
If the Name-of-the-Father is foreclosed (i.e. in psychosis), there can be no paternal metaphor, and hence no phallic signification.
See Also
References
- ↑ Hugo, 1859-83: 97-9
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book III. The Psychoses, 1955-56. Trans. Russell Grigg. London: Routledge, 1993. p.218-25; Lacan, Jacques. Le Séminaire. Livre IV. La relation d'objet, 19566-57. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. Paris: Seuil, 1991. p.377-8; Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.156-8; Lacan, Jacques. Le Séminaire. Livre VIII. Le transfert, 1960-61. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. Paris: Seuil, 1991. p.158-9
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Le Séminaire. Livre IV. La relation d'objet, 19566-57. Ed. Jacques-Alain Miller. Paris: Seuil, 1991. p.379
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.200