Difference between revisions of "Bejahung"
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
[[Category:Concepts]] | [[Category:Concepts]] | ||
[[Category:Terms]] | [[Category:Terms]] | ||
| − | [[Category: | + | [[Category:Edit]] |
{{Les termes}} | {{Les termes}} | ||
Revision as of 00:43, 21 August 2006
In his "Reply to Jean Hyppolite's commentary on Freud's Negation (1954), Lacan describes a primordial act of affirmation which is logically prior to any act of negation.[1]
Lacan uses Freud's German term, Bejahung ('affirmation') to denote this primordial affirmation.[2]
Whereas negation concerns what Freud called the "judgement of existence," Bejahung denotes something more fundamental, namely the primordial act of symbolization itself, the inclusion of something in the symbolic universe.
Only after a thing has been symbolized (at the level of Bejahung) can the value of existence be attributed to it or not (negation).
--
Lacan posits a basic alternative between Bejahung and the psychotic mechanism he later calls 'foreclosure'.
Bejahung designates a primordial inclusion of something in the symbolic, whereas foreclosure is a primordial refusal to include something (the Name-of-the-Father in the symbolic.[3]
See Also
References
- ↑ Lacan. "Reply to Jean Hyppolite's commentary on Freud's Negation". 1954b.
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. Écrits. Paris: Seuil, 1966. p.387
- ↑ Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book III. The Psychoses, 1955-56. Trans. Russell Grigg. London: Routledge, 1993. p.82
