Difference between revisions of "Counterpart"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
The term [[counterpart]] (''semblable'') designates other people in whom the subject perceives a likeness to himself (principally a visual likeness).
  
 +
The counterpart plays an important part in Lacan's work from the 1930s on, in the [[mirror stage]] and in the [[intrusion complex]].
  
==def==
+
The child identifies with his image on the basis of the recognition of bodily similarity. It is this identification that gives rise to the "imago of the counterpart."<ref>Lacan, 1938: 35-9</ref>
This notion of the 'specular ego' was first developed in the essay, 'The mirror Stage.'
 
  
==def==
+
The imago of the counterpart is interchangeable with the image of the subject's own body, the [[specular image]] with which the [[subject]] identifies in the [[mirror stage]], leading to the formation of the [[ego]].  
The term ‘counterpart’ (semblable) plays an important part in Lacan’s work from the 1930s on, and designates other people in whom the subject perceives a likeness to himslef (principally a visual likeness). The counterpart plays an important part in the intrusion complex and in the mirror stage.
 
  
The ‘imago of the counterpart’ is interchangeable with the image of the subject’s own body, the specular iamge with which the subject identifies in the mirror stage, leading to the formation of the ego. This interchangeability illustrates the way that the subject constitutes his objects on the basis of his ego. The image of another perosn’s body can only be identified with insofar as it is perceived as similar to one’s own body, and conversely the counterpart is only recognized as a separate, identifiable ego by projecting one’s own ego onto him.  
+
This interchangeability is evident in such phenomena as [[transitivism]], and illustrates the way that the subject constitutes his objects on the basis of his ego.  
 +
The image of another person's body can only be identified with insofar as it is perceived as similar to one's own body, and conversely the counterpart is only recognised as a separate, identifiable ego by projecting one's own ego onto him.
  
 +
In 1955 Lacan introduces a distinction between 'the [[big Other]]' and 'the little other' (or 'the [[imaginary other]]'), reserving the latter term for the counterpart and/or [[specular image]].
 +
The counterpart is the little other because it is not truly other at all; it is not the radical [[alterity]] represented by the [[Other]], but the other insofar as he is similar to the ego (hence the interchangeability of a and a' in [[schema L]]).
  
=def=
+
==def==
 
+
This notion of the 'specular ego' was first developed in the essay, 'The Mirror Stage.'
 
 
 
 
counterpart (ge√labie)                  The term 'counterpart' plays      an important
 
 
 
-part in Lacan's work from the 1930s on, and designates other people in whom
 
 
 
-the subject perceives a likeness to himself (principally a visual likeness). The
 
 
 
-counterpart plays an important part in the intrusion complex and in the MIRROR
 
 
 
      STAGE (Which are themselves closely interrelated).
 
 
 
        The intrusion complex is one of the three 'family complexes' which Lacan
 
 
 
      discusses in his 1938 article on the family, and arises when the child first
 
 
 
    realises that he has siblings, that other subjects like him participate in the
 
 
 
      family structure. The emphasis here is on likeness; the child identifies with his
 
 
 
      siblings on the basis of the recognition of bodily similarity (which depends, of
 
 
 
      course, on their being a relatively small age difference between the subject and
 
 
 
      his siblings). It is this identification that gives rise to the 'imago of the
 
 
 
      counterpart' (Lacan, 1938: 35-9).
 
 
 
        The imago of the counterpart is interchangeable with the image of the
 
 
 
    subject's own body, the SPECULAR IMAGE with which the subject identifies in
 
 
 
    the mirror stage, leading to the formation of the ego. This interchangeability is
 
 
 
    evident in such phenomena aS TRANSITIVISM, and illustrates the way that the
 
 
 
    subject constitutes his objects on the basis of his ego. The image of another
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
person's body can only be identified with insofar as it is perceived as similar to
 
 
 
  one's  own body, and conversely the counterpart is only recognised            as  a
 
 
 
separate, identifiable ego by projecting one's own ego onto him.
 
 
 
      In 1955 Lacan introduces a distinction between 'the big Other' and 'the little
 
 
 
  other' (or 'the imaginary other'), reserving the latter term for the counterpart
 
 
 
  and/or specular image. The counterpart is the little other because it is not truly
 
 
 
  other at all; it is not the radical alterity represented by the Other, but the other
 
 
 
  insofar as he is similar to the ego (hence the interchangeability of a and a' in
 
  
  schema L).
+
[[Category:Terms]]
 +
[[Category:Concepts]]
 +
[[Category:Imaginary]]
 +
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]

Revision as of 02:44, 22 May 2006

The term counterpart (semblable) designates other people in whom the subject perceives a likeness to himself (principally a visual likeness).

The counterpart plays an important part in Lacan's work from the 1930s on, in the mirror stage and in the intrusion complex.

The child identifies with his image on the basis of the recognition of bodily similarity. It is this identification that gives rise to the "imago of the counterpart."[1]

The imago of the counterpart is interchangeable with the image of the subject's own body, the specular image with which the subject identifies in the mirror stage, leading to the formation of the ego.

This interchangeability is evident in such phenomena as transitivism, and illustrates the way that the subject constitutes his objects on the basis of his ego. The image of another person's body can only be identified with insofar as it is perceived as similar to one's own body, and conversely the counterpart is only recognised as a separate, identifiable ego by projecting one's own ego onto him.

In 1955 Lacan introduces a distinction between 'the big Other' and 'the little other' (or 'the imaginary other'), reserving the latter term for the counterpart and/or specular image. The counterpart is the little other because it is not truly other at all; it is not the radical alterity represented by the Other, but the other insofar as he is similar to the ego (hence the interchangeability of a and a' in schema L).

def

This notion of the 'specular ego' was first developed in the essay, 'The Mirror Stage.'

  1. Lacan, 1938: 35-9