Difference between revisions of "Literature and Psychoanalysis"
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Since the origins of psychoanalysis, the field has displayed a powerful set of connections to literature, one that might even be called a mutual fascination. Literary criticism, primarily in its academic form, has been the major mediator between the two disciplines. The three domains of psychoanalysis, literature, and literary criticism (or literary theory) intertwine and seek to use each other in distinctive ways. Psychoanalysis has occasionally sought to explain literature but far more often uses literature as a source or exemplar for... | + | Since the origins of [[psychoanalysis]], the field has displayed a powerful set of connections to [[literature]], one that might even be called a mutual [[fascination]]. [[Literary]] criticism, primarily in its academic [[form]], has been the major mediator between the two disciplines. The [[three]] domains of psychoanalysis, literature, and [[literary criticism]] (or literary [[theory]]) intertwine and seek to use each [[other]] in distinctive ways. Psychoanalysis has occasionally sought to explain literature but far more often uses literature as a source or exemplar for... |
Latest revision as of 01:07, 26 May 2019
Since the origins of psychoanalysis, the field has displayed a powerful set of connections to literature, one that might even be called a mutual fascination. Literary criticism, primarily in its academic form, has been the major mediator between the two disciplines. The three domains of psychoanalysis, literature, and literary criticism (or literary theory) intertwine and seek to use each other in distinctive ways. Psychoanalysis has occasionally sought to explain literature but far more often uses literature as a source or exemplar for...
