Difference between revisions of "Sadism/Masochism"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
  
 +
''sadism''/''masochism'' (''sadisme''/''masochisme'')
  
sadism/masochism (sadisme/masochisme)                              
+
                              
The terms 'sadism'  and 'masochism' were coined by Krafft-Ebing in 1893, with reference to the Marquis de Sade and Baron Sacher von Masoch. Krafft-Ebing used the terms in  a very specific sense, to refer to        a sexual    PERVERSION in which sexual satisfaction is dependent upon inflicting pain          on others (sadism)    or upon experiencing pain oneself (masochism). When Freud took up the terms in his Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality, he used them in the same sense  as Krafft-Ebing (Freud, 1905d). Following Krafft-Ebing, Freud posited an intrinsic connection between sadism and masochism, arguing that they are simply the active and passive aspects of a single perversion.
+
The terms '[[sadism]]'  and '[[masochism]]' were coined by Krafft-Ebing in 1893, with reference to the Marquis de Sade and Baron Sacher von Masoch.  
Lacan too argues that sadism and masochism are intimately related, both being related to the invocatory drive (which he also calls the 'sado-masochistic drive'; S11, 183). Both the masochist and the sadist locate themselves as the object of the invocatory drive, the voice. However, whereas Freud argues that sadism is primary, Lacan argues that masochism is primary, and sadism is derived from it: 'sadism is merely the disavowal of masochism' (Sll, 186).
 
Thus, whereas the masochist prefers to experience the pain of existence in his own body, the sadist rejects this pain and forces the Other to bear it (Ec, 778).
 
  
Masochism occupies    a special place among the perversions, just          as the invoking drive occupies a privileged place among the partial drives; it is the 'limit-experience' in the attempt to go beyond the pleasure principle.
+
Krafft-Ebing used the terms in  a very specific sense, to refer to a [[sexual]] [[perversion]] in which [[sexual]] [[satisfaction]] is dependent upon inflicting [[pain]] on others ([[sadism]]) or upon experiencing [[pain]] oneself ([[masochism]]).  
  
 +
When [[Freud]] took up the terms in his [[Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality]], he used them in the same sense as Krafft-Ebing.<ref>Freud, 1905d</ref>
  
==def==
+
Following Krafft-Ebing, [[Freud]] posited an intrinsic connection between [[sadism]] and [[masochism]], arguing that they are simply the [[active]] and [[passive]] aspects of a single [[perversion]].
Sadism
+
 
Sadism is pleasure derived from inflicting cruelty on another person. Richard von Krafft-Ebing coined the term in reference to the writings of the Marquis de Sade. In "Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality" (1905d) Sigmund Freud described sadism as the active form in a pair of opposites, masochism being the passive form of the same sexual perversion.
+
[[Lacan]] too argues that [[sadism]] and [[masochism]] are intimately related, both being related to the invocatory [[drive]]<ref>{{S11}} p.183</ref>
 +
 
 +
Both the [[masochist]] and the [[sadist]] locate themselves as the [[object]] of the invocatory [[drive]], the [[voice]].
 +
 
 +
However, whereas [[Freud]] argues that [[sadism]] is primary, [[Lacan]] argues that [[masochism]] is primary, and [[sadism]] is derived from it:
 +
"sadism is merely the disavowal of masochism."<ref>{{Sll}} p.186</ref>
 +
 
 +
Thus, whereas the [[masochist]] prefers to experience the [[pain]] of [[existence]] in his own [[body]], the [[sadist]] rejects this [[pain]] and forces the [[Other]] to bear it (Ec, 778).
 +
 
 +
[[Masochism]] occupies a special place among the [[perversis, just as the invoking [[drive]] occupies a privileged place among the partial [[drive]]s; it is the 'limit-experience' in the attempt to go [[beyond the pleasure principle]].
 +
 
 +
 
 +
Sadism is pleasure derived from inflicting cruelty on another person.  
 +
Richard von Krafft-Ebing coined the term in reference to the writings of the Marquis de Sade.  
 +
In "Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality" (1905d) Sigmund Freud described sadism as the active form in a pair of opposites, masochism being the passive form of the same sexual perversion.
 
Two pregenital libidinal phases are described, the oral-sadistic (or cannibalistic) stage, and the anal-sadistic stage, which remains active during later libidinal development....
 
Two pregenital libidinal phases are described, the oral-sadistic (or cannibalistic) stage, and the anal-sadistic stage, which remains active during later libidinal development....
 
==sadomasochism==
 
  
 
Sadism and masochism represent contrasting forms of pleasure derived from sexual excitation linked to cruelty and the infliction of pain. While both currents are present in any given individual, they also represent pregenital links in an intersubjective context in which one partner is the sadist and the other the masochist. Sadomasochism may have an oral component but takes on characteristic form during the anal sadistic stage.
 
Sadism and masochism represent contrasting forms of pleasure derived from sexual excitation linked to cruelty and the infliction of pain. While both currents are present in any given individual, they also represent pregenital links in an intersubjective context in which one partner is the sadist and the other the masochist. Sadomasochism may have an oral component but takes on characteristic form during the anal sadistic stage.
 
In ''Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality'' (1905d), Freud pointed out that sadism and masochism,...
 
In ''Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality'' (1905d), Freud pointed out that sadism and masochism,...
  
 
+
==See Also==
 
 
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
 +
[[Category:New]]
 +
[[Cateogry:Help]]
 
[[Category:Sexuality]]
 
[[Category:Sexuality]]
[[Category:Lacan]]
+
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
 
[[Category:Terms]]
 
[[Category:Terms]]
 
[[Category:Concepts]]
 
[[Category:Concepts]]
 +
[[Category:Sexuality]]
 
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
 
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]

Revision as of 13:01, 21 June 2006

sadism/masochism (sadisme/masochisme)


The terms 'sadism' and 'masochism' were coined by Krafft-Ebing in 1893, with reference to the Marquis de Sade and Baron Sacher von Masoch.

Krafft-Ebing used the terms in a very specific sense, to refer to a sexual perversion in which sexual satisfaction is dependent upon inflicting pain on others (sadism) or upon experiencing pain oneself (masochism).

When Freud took up the terms in his Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality, he used them in the same sense as Krafft-Ebing.[1]

Following Krafft-Ebing, Freud posited an intrinsic connection between sadism and masochism, arguing that they are simply the active and passive aspects of a single perversion.

Lacan too argues that sadism and masochism are intimately related, both being related to the invocatory drive[2]

Both the masochist and the sadist locate themselves as the object of the invocatory drive, the voice.

However, whereas Freud argues that sadism is primary, Lacan argues that masochism is primary, and sadism is derived from it: "sadism is merely the disavowal of masochism."[3]

Thus, whereas the masochist prefers to experience the pain of existence in his own body, the sadist rejects this pain and forces the Other to bear it (Ec, 778).

Masochism occupies a special place among the [[perversis, just as the invoking drive occupies a privileged place among the partial drives; it is the 'limit-experience' in the attempt to go beyond the pleasure principle.


Sadism is pleasure derived from inflicting cruelty on another person. Richard von Krafft-Ebing coined the term in reference to the writings of the Marquis de Sade. In "Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality" (1905d) Sigmund Freud described sadism as the active form in a pair of opposites, masochism being the passive form of the same sexual perversion. Two pregenital libidinal phases are described, the oral-sadistic (or cannibalistic) stage, and the anal-sadistic stage, which remains active during later libidinal development....

Sadism and masochism represent contrasting forms of pleasure derived from sexual excitation linked to cruelty and the infliction of pain. While both currents are present in any given individual, they also represent pregenital links in an intersubjective context in which one partner is the sadist and the other the masochist. Sadomasochism may have an oral component but takes on characteristic form during the anal sadistic stage. In Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality (1905d), Freud pointed out that sadism and masochism,...

See Also

References

  1. Freud, 1905d
  2. Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book XI. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, 1964. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Hogarth Press and Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1977. p.183
  3. Template:Sll p.186

Cateogry:Help