|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Top}}signe{{Bottom}} | | {{Top}}signe{{Bottom}} |
| | | |
| + | According to [[Saussure]], the [[sign]] is a basic unit of [[language]]. |
| | | |
− | ===Ferdinand de Saussure===
| + | The [[linguistics|linguistic]] [[sign]] is a unification of a sound-image (the [[signifier]]) with a concept (the [[signified]]). |
− | [[Image:SAUSSUREANSIGN.gif|thumb|300px|right|The Saussurean Sign]] | |
− | According to [[Saussure]], the [[sign]] is the basic unit of [[language]]
| |
− | | |
− | The [[sign]] is constituted by two elements:
| |
− | # a conceptual element (which [[Saussure]] calls the [[signified]]), and
| |
− | # a phonological element (called the [[signifier]]).
| |
− | | |
− | The two elements are linked by an arbitrary but unbreakable bond.
| |
− | | |
− | =====Saussurean Sign=====
| |
− | [[Saussure]] represented the [[sign]] by means of a diagram.<ref>[[Saussure|Saussure, Ferdinand de]]. (1916) ''[[Saussure|Course in General Linguistics]]'', ed. Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, trans. Wade Baskin, Glasgow: Collins Fontana. p.114</ref> In this diagram, the line between the [[signified]] and the [[signifier]] represents union, the reciprocal implication of the two elements.
| |
− | | |
− | =====Jacques Lacan=====
| |
− | [[Lacan]] takes up the [[Saussure]]an concept of the [[sign]] in his "linguistic turn" in [[psychoanalysis]] during the 1950s, but subjects it to several modifications. During the 1950s [[Lacan]] began to make us of [[Saussure]]'s concepts but adapted them in important ways.
| |
− | | |
− | =====Relation between Signifier and Signified=====
| |
− | Firstly, whereas [[Saussure]] posited the reciprocal implication between [[signifier]] and [[signified]] (they are as mutually interdependent as two sides of a sheet of paper), [[Lacan]] argues that the relation between [[signifier]] and [[signified]] is extremely unstable.
| |
− | | |
− | =====Primacy of the Signifier=====
| |
− | Secondly, [[Lacan]] asserts the [[existence]] of an order of "pure signifiers," where [[signifier]]s exist prior to [[signified]]s; this [[order]] of purely logical [[structure]] is the [[unconscious]]. This amounts to a destruction of [[Saussure]]'s concept of the [[sign]]; for [[Lacan]], a [[language]] is not composed of [[sign]]s but of [[signifier]]s.
| |
− | | |
− | =====Saussurean algorithm=====
| |
− | [[Image:SAUSSUREANALGORITHM.gif|right|thumb|Saussurean algorithm|The Saussurean algorithm]]
| |
− | | |
− | To illustrate the contrast between his own views and those of [[Saussure]], [[Lacan]] replaces [[Saussure]]'s diagram of the [[sign]] with an [[Saussurean algorithm|algorithm]] which, [[Lacan]] argues, should be attributed to [[Saussure]] -- and is thus now sometimes referred to as the "[[Saussure]]an algorithm."<ref>{{E}} p.149</ref> The '''S''' stands for the [[signifier]], and the '''s''' for the [[signified]]; the position of the [[signified]] and the [[signifier]] is thus inverted, showing the primacy of the [[signifier]] (which is capitalized, whereas the [[signifier]] is reduced to mere lower-case italic). The arrows and the circle are abolished, representing the [[absence]] of a stable or fixed relation between [[signifier]] and [[signified]]. The [[bar]] between the [[signifier]] and the [[signified]] no longer represents union but the [[resistance]] inherent in [[signification]]. For [[Lacan]], this [[algorithm]] defines "the [[topography]] of the [[unconscious]]."<ref>{{E}} p.163</ref>
| |
− | | |
| | | |
| ==See Also== | | ==See Also== |