Sign

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Revision as of 04:10, 18 August 2006 by Riot Hero (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search
Fr. signe

Jacques Lacan

Lacan defines the sign as that which "represents something for someone," in opposition to the signifier, which is "that which represents a subject for another signifier."[1]

Semotics

By engaging with the concept of the sign, Lacan sets his work in close relation to the science of semiotics, which has grown rapidly in the twentieth century.

Two main lines of development can be discerned within semiotics: the European line associated with Ferdinand de Saussure (which Saussure himself baptized with the name of "semiology"), and the North American line associated with Charles S. Peirce.

Ferdinand de Saussure

According to Saussure, the sign is the basic unit of language

The sign is constituted by two elements:

  1. a conceptual element (which Saussure calls the signified), and
  2. a phonological element (called the signifier).

The two elements are linked by an arbitrary but unbreakable bond.

Saussurean Sign

[[Image:SAUSSUREANSIGN.gif|thumb|right|The Saussurean Sign Saussure represented the sign by means of a diagram.[2]

In this diagram, the line between the signified and the signifier represents union, the reciprocal implication of the two elements.

Jacques Lacan

Lacan takes up the Saussurean concept of the sign in his "linguistic turn" in psychoanalysis during the 1950s, but subjects it to several modifications.

Relation between Signifier and Signified

Firstly, whereas Saussure posited the reciprocal implication between signifier and signified (they are as mutually interdependent as two sides of a sheet of paper), Lacan argues that the relation between signifier and signified is extremely unstable.

Primacy of the Signifier

Secondly, Lacan asserts the existence of an order of "pure signifiers," where signifiers exist prior to signifieds; this order of purely logical structure is the unconscious.

This amounts to a destruction of Saussure's concept of the sign; for Lacan, a language is not composed of signs but of signifiers.

Saussurean algorithm

[[Image:Lacan-saussureanalgorithm.jpg|right|thumb|The Saussurean algorithm]] To illustrate the contrast between his own views and those of Saussure, Lacan replaces Saussure's diagram of the sign with an [[|Saussurean algorithm|algorithm]] which, Lacan argues, should be attributed to Saussure -- and is thus now sometimes referred to as the "Saussurean algorithm."[3]

The S stands for the signifier, and the s for the signified; the position of the signified and the signifier is thus inverted, showing the primacy of the signifier (which is capitalized, whereas the signifier is reduced to mere lower-case italic).

The arrows and the circle are abolished, representing the absence of a stable or fixed relation between signifier and signified.

The bar between the signifier and the signified no longer represents union but the resistance inherent in signification.

For Lacan, this algorithm defines "the topography of the unconscious."[4]














See Also

References

  1. Lacan, Jacques. The Seminar. Book XI. The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, 1964. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Hogarth Press and Institute of Psycho-Analysis, 1977. p.207
  2. Saussure, Ferdinand de. (1916) Course in General Linguistics, ed. Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, trans. Wade Baskin, Glasgow: Collins Fontana. p.114
  3. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.149
  4. Lacan, Jacques. Écrits: A Selection. Trans. Alan Sheridan. London: Tavistock Publications, 1977. p.163