Difference between revisions of "Analysis Terminable and Interminable"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | |||
+ | In ''[[Analysis Terminable and Interminable]]'' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [[Freud]] discusses the question of whether it is ever possible to conclude an [[analysis]], or whether all [[analyses]] are necessarily incomplete.<ref>{{F}} 1937. ''[[Analysis Terminable and Interminable|Die endliche und die unendliche Analyse]]''. GW, 16. ''[[Analysis Terminable and Interminable]]''. 1937. [[SE]] XXIII p.209-253</ref> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Is analysis terminable? How, and in what sense? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | "Is there such a thing as a natural end to an analysis?"<ref>p.219</ref> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Revision as of 20:05, 7 August 2006
In Analysis Terminable and Interminable
Freud discusses the question of whether it is ever possible to conclude an analysis, or whether all analyses are necessarily incomplete.[1]
Is analysis terminable? How, and in what sense?
"Is there such a thing as a natural end to an analysis?"[2]
References
- ↑ Freud, Sigmund. 1937. Die endliche und die unendliche Analyse. GW, 16. Analysis Terminable and Interminable. 1937. SE XXIII p.209-253
- ↑ p.219