Difference between revisions of "Imago"

From No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis
Jump to: navigation, search
(The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The Latin word imago simply means "image", but it has acquired a number of powerful connotations over time. Christian theology refers to the "imago Dei", the image of God in which human beings were created and with which they should strive to conform. [[Carl Jung | Carl Gustav Jung]] introduced the term into psychology; for Jung, the individual forms a personality by identifying with imagos that emerge from the collective unconscious, a shared reservoir of mythical figures and scenarios. Lacan takes up the term to refer to the image the infant sees in the mirror (or the image of the caregiver) and with which the infant identifies. In the ah-ha experience that characterizes the mirror stage, the infant grasps the connection between the image and its own existence. The infant experiences the imago as a [[Gestalt]], a meaningful form.
+
==Psychoanalysis==
 +
Originally introduced into [[psychoanalytic theory]] by [[Jung]] in 1911, the [[Latin]] term ''[[imago]]'' had already become standard in [[psychoanalytic]] [[:category:terms|terminology]] by the [[time]] [[Lacan]] began [[training]] as a [[psychoanalyst]] in the 1930s.
  
It is important to note that the imago is external to the infant. The "I" comes into being not as an emanation of the individual, but as the result of an encounter with an [[other]].
+
==Images==
{{Les termes}}
+
The term is clearly related to the term "[[image]]", but it is meant to emphasize the [[subjective]] determination of the [[image]]; in [[other]] [[words]], it includes [[feelings]] as well as a [[visual]] [[representation]].
 +
 
 +
[[Imago]]s are specifically [[image]]s of other [[people]].
 +
 
 +
However, they are not the product of purely personal [[experience]] but [[universal]] prototypes which may be actualized in anyone's [[psyche]].
 +
 
 +
[[Imago]]s act as stereotypes influencing the way the [[subject]] relates to other people, who are perceived through the lens of these various [[imago]]s.
 +
 
 +
==Complex==
 +
The term "[[imago]]" occupies a central [[role]] in [[Lacan]]'s pre-1950 writings, where it is closely related to the term [[complex]].
 +
 
 +
In 1938, [[Lacan]] [[links]] each of the [[three]] [[family complex]]es to a specific [[imago]]: the [[weaning]] [[complex]] is liked to the [[imago]] of the [[maternal]] [[breast]], the [[intrusion complex]] to the [[imago]] of the [[counterpart]], and the [[Oedipus complex]] to the [[imago]] of the [[father]].<ref>{{1938}}</ref>
 +
 
 +
==Psychology==
 +
In 1946, [[Lacan]] argues that in formulating the [[concept]] of the [[imago]], [[psychoanalysis]] has provided [[psychology]] with a proper [[object]] of study and thus set [[psychology]] on a truly [[scientific]] footing.
 +
 
 +
<blockquote>"It is possible.. to designate in the imago the proper object of psychology, exactly to the same extent that [[Galileo]]'s [[notion]] of the inert [[material]] poitn formed the basis of phsyics."<ref>{{Ec}} p. 188</ref></blockquote>
 +
 
 +
==Negative Effects==
 +
Whereas for [[Jung]] and [[Klein]] [[imago]]s have equally positive and [[negative]] effects, in [[Lacan]]'s [[work]] they are weighted firmly towards the negative, [[being]] funamentally deceptive and disruptive elements.
 +
 
 +
[[Lacan]] speaks of the [[imago]] of the [[fragmented body]], and even [[autonomy|unified]] [[imago]]s such as the [[specular image]] are mere [[illusion]]s of [[lack|wholeness]] which introduce an underlying [[aggressivity]].
 +
 
 +
<blockquote>"The first effect of the imago which appears in the [[human]] being is an effect of subjective ''[[alienation]]''.<ref>{{Ec}} p. 181</ref></blockquote>
 +
 
 +
==Jacques Lacan==
 +
After 1950 the term "[[imago]]" [[disappears]] almost entirely from [[Lacan]]'s [[theoretical]] [[:category:concepts|vocabulary]].
 +
 
 +
However, the basis [[ideas]] developed around the term in [[Lacan]]'s pre-1950 writings continue to play an important part in his [[thinking]], being articulated around other [[terms]], principally the term "[[image]]".
 +
 
 +
==See Also==
 +
{{See}}
 +
* [[Complex]]
 +
* [[Counterpart]]
 +
||
 +
* [[Fragmented body]]
 +
* [[Lack]]
 +
||
 +
* [[Image]]
 +
* [[Specular image]]
 +
{{Also}}
 +
 
 +
==References==
 +
<div style="font-size:11px" class="references-small">
 +
<references/>
 +
</div>
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Psychoanalysis]]
 +
[[Category:Jacques Lacan]]
 +
[[Category:Imaginary]]
 +
[[Category:Dictionary]]
 +
[[Category:Concepts]]
 +
[[Category:Terms]]
 +
{{OK}}
 +
 
 +
__NOTOC__

Latest revision as of 00:14, 25 May 2019

Psychoanalysis

Originally introduced into psychoanalytic theory by Jung in 1911, the Latin term imago had already become standard in psychoanalytic terminology by the time Lacan began training as a psychoanalyst in the 1930s.

Images

The term is clearly related to the term "image", but it is meant to emphasize the subjective determination of the image; in other words, it includes feelings as well as a visual representation.

Imagos are specifically images of other people.

However, they are not the product of purely personal experience but universal prototypes which may be actualized in anyone's psyche.

Imagos act as stereotypes influencing the way the subject relates to other people, who are perceived through the lens of these various imagos.

Complex

The term "imago" occupies a central role in Lacan's pre-1950 writings, where it is closely related to the term complex.

In 1938, Lacan links each of the three family complexes to a specific imago: the weaning complex is liked to the imago of the maternal breast, the intrusion complex to the imago of the counterpart, and the Oedipus complex to the imago of the father.[1]

Psychology

In 1946, Lacan argues that in formulating the concept of the imago, psychoanalysis has provided psychology with a proper object of study and thus set psychology on a truly scientific footing.

"It is possible.. to designate in the imago the proper object of psychology, exactly to the same extent that Galileo's notion of the inert material poitn formed the basis of phsyics."[2]

Negative Effects

Whereas for Jung and Klein imagos have equally positive and negative effects, in Lacan's work they are weighted firmly towards the negative, being funamentally deceptive and disruptive elements.

Lacan speaks of the imago of the fragmented body, and even unified imagos such as the specular image are mere illusions of wholeness which introduce an underlying aggressivity.

"The first effect of the imago which appears in the human being is an effect of subjective alienation.[3]

Jacques Lacan

After 1950 the term "imago" disappears almost entirely from Lacan's theoretical vocabulary.

However, the basis ideas developed around the term in Lacan's pre-1950 writings continue to play an important part in his thinking, being articulated around other terms, principally the term "image".

See Also

References